The Urban Task Force

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance An independent report by

members of the Urban Task Force

chaired by Lord Rogers of Riverside

2

In 1998 the Deputy Prime Minister invited me to set up the Urban Task Force to identify causes of urban decline and establish a vision for our cities, founded on the principles of design excellence, social wellbeing and environmental responsibility within appropriate delivery, fiscal and legal frameworks. Many of our 105 recommendations have been addressed by the Government, shaping much of current and future national policy on England’s towns and cities.In the original Urban Task Force Report, we set out a vision:a vision of well designed, compact and connected cities supporting a diverse range of uses – where people live, work and enjoy leisure time at close quarters – in a

sustainable urban environment well integrated with public transport and adaptable to change. Six years on, and with a third successive Labour Government in place, there are some notable successes:

?For the first time in 50 years there has been a measurable change of culture in favour of towns and cities, reflecting a nationwide commitment to the Urban Renaissance. ?People have started to move back into city centres: in 1990 there were 90 people living in the heart of

Manchester, today there are 25,000 residents; over the same period the population of central Liverpool has increased fourfold.

?By adhering to the principle of sequential testing, re-use of brownfield land instead of building houses on greenfield sites has been encouraged. Today, a national average of 70% of new development is on brownfield land, compared with 56% in 1997.

?Building densities have increased, from an average of 25dwellings per hectare in 1997 to 40 dwellings per hectare in 2005, making better use of our land and resources.?The Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment is now an established champion of design quality; the Academy for Sustainable Communities and the regional centres have been launched to address the skills deficit.

?Local authority performance is on an upward trend. The Audit Commission’s Comprehensive Performance Assessment of local authorities across the country has found the vast majority to be ‘good’ through to ‘excellent’.?There has been some progress to reduce the environmental impact of new buildings with a new and welcome code of sustainable building.

?There has been a significant increase in investment in

public transport infrastructure, with greater attention given to the needs of pedestrians and sustainable transport.?Private investment has been levered into the cities. Since 1996, ￡2 billion of private sector investment has flowed into the Manchester city region alone.

?￡39 billion has been allocated over the next five years to deliver the Sustainable Communities Plan across England.?Cities and regions have greater powers to control their destiny.

Thanks to these measures, and a period of sustained economic growth and stability, England’s cities are very different places from the post-industrial centres of unemployment and failing public services of twenty years ago. English cities have established themselves as powerhouses in the UK economy and centres for cultural innovation. They stand more confidently on the international stage.

This progress is cause for celebration, but not evidence that the job is done. New issues have emerged, and old issues remain, which require renewed attention from Government. ?Failure to keep up with the challenge of climate change threatens enduring environmental degradation.

?Middle class families are moving out of towns and cities in search of better schools, less congestion and a safer environment. In 2001, only 28% of people in inner London were aged 45 or older, compared with 40% across the UK as a whole.

The Urban Renaissance six years on by Richard Rogers

Contents

The Urban Renaissance six years on 2Introduction

41Design excellence 52Social wellbeing

93Environmental responsibility

124Delivery, fiscal and legal frameworks 15Postscript

18Acknowledgments

19

3

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

?

Massive inequalities persist in our cities. Competition for space pushes up prices for housing, making access for lower income households much harder.

?Social housing supply is too low. The Barker Report estimated that an extra ￡1.2bn is required each year to subsidise 17,000 additional social housing units. ?Growing housing demand is a big challenge. How can we build compact, well-designed, sustainable neighbourhoods which make best use of brownfield sites, are well served by public transport, hospitals,schools and other amenities, and do not weaken existing urban areas?

?Opportunities to create sustainable, environmentally

friendly communities are being missed because transport provision and funding is still too dislocated from the overall planning process.

?Few well-designed integrated urban projects stand out as international exemplars of sustainable communities,despite public investment in new housing.

?Design quality is not a central objective for public bodies with responsibility for the built environment. These often lack design input at board or cabinet level.

?The confusing sponsorship and funding arrangements of the Regional Development Agencies – through which they are 85% funded by ODPM but sponsored by the DTI –have led them to focus on economic development, jobs and growth rather than high quality, well-designed,sustainable urban development.

?Design advice to Ministers, Mayors, local authority leaders and cabinets is still too limited.

?The plethora of overlapping, but differently funded and monitored, regeneration bodies has reduced the effectiveness of public sector led regeneration schemes.Sustainable regeneration of large complex areas (e.g. Thames Gateway) suffers from fragmented decision-

making processes and institutions which lack coherent area-based delivery mechanisms.

?Whilst focusing on sustainable communities, we have weakened our stance on urban regeneration.

To solve the problems facing us today and build on our successes to date we have to learn from the experience of the past six years, reflect honestly on what has worked and where problems remain, and take decisions now to ensure the mechanisms to deliver an urban renaissance are fit to meet the exacting demands of the vision.

That is why I have asked my colleagues from the Urban Task Force to collaborate in writing this short report. It is not a comprehensive update of ‘Towards an Urban Renaissance,’the final report of the Urban Task Force in 1999. Rather, it is an independent report based on the personal experience of Urban Task Force members on the ground, designed to stimulate public debate and encourage new thinking.I hope this work will help us realise the widely shared vision of a lasting Urban Renaissance in England.

Richard Rogers November 2005

Introduction

4

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

This report comes at a pivotal time for urban regeneration.Today, cities are seen as assets rather than liabilities. Their role as engines of economic growth is widely accepted and their spheres of influence – the city regions – are becoming recognised as fundamental building blocks in the national fabric. Against this backdrop of a shift in culture, milestones such as the Neighbourhood Renewal Areas, growing housing demand and proposals to develop London for the 2012Olympic Games present once in a lifetime opportunities.Decisions taken today will dictate for a generation whether English cities can realise their potential to shape a more sustainable future for us all.

This national sense of urgency is reinforced by pressing environmental challenges at a global and local level. In March 2005, the Government launched a new strategy for sustainable development, which set out principles through which people can enjoy a better quality of life without

compromising the quality of life of future generations. In this report, we show how urban regeneration has a crucial role to play in delivering that strategy. Done well, urban development can help us live within the limits of environmental resources and slow demand for energy and materials through efficiency measures and recycling. Done wrong, development can increase pollution, widen social and economic inequalities and deprive future generations of environmental assets.The vision of the Urban Task Force remains an integrated and multifaceted one founded on the creation of urban communities that:

?are well designed, compact and connected ?support a diverse range of uses in a sustainable urban environment

?are well-integrated with public transport ?are adaptable to change.

True to that vision, and in keeping with the original mission of the Urban Task Force, we make recommendations in this report based on the principles of:?design excellence ?social wellbeing, and ?environmental responsibility

set within a viable and sustainable economic, legislative and delivery framework.

Chapter One looks at quality of design. We recommend that the design of buildings and public spaces be hardwired into the public institutions responsible for delivering sustainable communities by placing design champions at strategic board level, making design quality a corporate objective, and

reinforcing this in the way Government funds and tasks their activity. We recommend a strengthening of design advice to ministers, mayors, local authority leaders and cabinets. We recommend that public transport be funded and prioritised based on its potential to deliver urban regeneration, not just on a transport business case.

Chapter Two looks at social wellbeing. We want to encourage communities of mixed tenure, income and

ethnicity by increasing the supply of affordable rented and owner occupied housing within existing built up areas close to local amenities and open space. We also recommend a target to transform all social housing estates into mixed tenure communities by 2012.

Chapter Three considers our response to pressing environmental challenges. We urge an approach to the growth areas that strengthens and regenerates existing urban communities and takes a brownfield-first approach to development. We recommend extending the national Code for Sustainable Buildings to all new housing developments by the end of 2006, and encourage the Government to extend similar measures to existing buildings.

Chapter Four examines the delivery, fiscal and legal

frameworks within which the principles of urban renewal must be turned into practical action. We believe city governments and mayors should be empowered to raise taxes and funds,and we recommend Urban Regeneration Companies be given the powers they need to take a pre-eminent role.

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Introduction

A key message of the Urban Task Force was that urban neighbourhoods should be vital, safe and beautiful places

to live. This is not just a matter of aesthetics, but of economics. As cities compete with each other to host increasingly footloose international companies, their credentials as attractive, vibrant homes are major selling points. This demands that ever greater significance be given to the design and management of the public realm. Well-designed and maintained public spaces should be at the heart of any community. They are the foundation for public interaction and social integration, and provide the sense of place essential to engender civic pride.

Progress

It has been widely recognised that the physical and social spheres must be linked to be truly sustainable, and there has been a concerted attempt to tackle inequality by promoting more affordable housing. However, quality and delivery have been extremely weak. Despite over ￡2bn being invested by central government in urban regeneration since 2000, only a handful of completed projects can be considered of international stature. The Millennium Village in Greenwich, innovative schemes in Manchester and the many visionary Peabody Housing projects in London are encouraging examples.

The majority of new developments remain poorly designed, with public realm and buildings of a very low quality. Where some good practice has emerged, it tends to be in smaller ‘infill’ schemes where designers can relate to an existing context. However, too many housing projects are just that –thoughtlessly laid out groups of cheaply built fragmented residential units relatively isolated from surrounding communities. These often lack the core social and commercial institutions that sustain urban life and any sense of place or beauty. There is a risk of increased ghettoisation between market and subsidised housing.

The reasons for this are four-fold. First, there is a lack of vision at the outset, compounded by overweight decision making structures that are unable to focus and prioritise. Secondly, the procurement and delivery process is fragmented and not joined-up. Thirdly, quality of design is not considered a priority by many of the public institutions investing in the country’s urban regeneration effort. Fourthly, public bodies lack core delivery skills.

The Urban Task Force report argued strongly that the institutions tasked with delivering the urban renaissance (such as the Regional Development Agencies, Urban Development Corporations, Urban Regeneration Companies and English Partnerships) should place the quality of the built environment at the heart of their mission. This has not happened. Too many delivery agencies focus on site delivery rather than quality of design, so will never deliver the quality and variety of urban communities championed by the Urban Task Force. Ministers are also hampered in making planning decisions when CABE – their adviser on design issues – has been previously involved in the planning process.

At the delivery end, design culture is not yet embedded in the procurement and management process. The Urban Task Force recommended that public funds should only be invested in significant urban projects that are subject to design competitions and that all major schemes should be conceived as three-dimensional spatial masterplans. While the last six years has seen many competitions in the UK

for urban masterplans, the vast majority have been badly run, lagging well behind the standards of our European colleagues. Despite the wealth of design talent available nationally and internationally, they have not yielded a new generation of high quality solutions. The quality of design briefs is often poor – ignoring the Urban Task Force recommendations for integrated, spatial design that gives priority to connectivity, social inclusion, high quality public space and sustainability. A clear and deliverable public realm strategy must be a pre-requisite for any sustainable community, rather than an afterthought or planning gain

add-on. Strict design codes, such as those used for planning layouts, are no replacement for well informed design professionals.

In our mind, the same high standards for sustainable inclusive design should apply to private projects as to those driven by the public sector. In areas of the country where the housing market is overheated, we are concerned that the need for short-term ‘numbers’ is overtaking the need for long-term vision. Many large-scale projects, often in sensitive town and city sites, are being developed in a piecemeal fashion without appropriate investment in the quality of the

1

Design excellence

1 Design excellence5

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

public realm, appropriate access and the design of individual buildings. Although the levers of public funding and other control mechanisms cannot be brought to bear on private projects, the design of individual housing units must be improved and the quality increased to reflect advances in new technologies, construction techniques and environmental efficiency. The Urban Task Force did not address the issue of the private residential sector in detail, but it is clear that new measures are needed to ensure that private housebuilders – despite their best intentions – do not build a new generation of mono-functional enclaves based on lowest common denominator design.

Transport

Transport lies at the heart of urban regeneration. In the original Urban Task Force report we presented a vision

of how this should be done: road space would be planned, as it is in the most advanced European cities, to give priority to walking, cycling and public transport; a seamless-web system of fast, efficient public transport would connect city centres with strong sub-centres developed around transport interchanges, allowing quick and easy transfer from express light rail to feeder buses; planned densities would increase around these points of maximum accessibility, and mixed uses would maximise easy access on foot to shops and services.

In a few best-practice cities and towns there are signs

that this is beginning to happen. In London, the congestion charge has helped civilise conditions in the centre, the

bus system has responded massively and flexibly to the challenge of growth, commuter rail has modernised and responded to rising demand. There are individual good examples in other cities, especially in their central areas where civilised public spaces have been created. But they are few and far between. Urban streets are over-engineered to maximise traffic flow, pedestrians and cyclists are still treated as second- or third-class citizens, and public transport in most cities is totally un-integrated. The root of the problem is that decisions on urban transport are taken piecemeal, in apparent isolation from their impact on regeneration; indeed, there appears to be next to no evaluation of the broad regeneration benefits that investments would help bring about. Merseytram has stalled, despite the renewal it would bring to a corridor stretching from Liverpool’s Pier Head via Lime Street and Norris Green to Kirkby. Manchester’s Metrolink extensions have not started, despite their vital importance to the regeneration of New East Manchester. Money is lacking to extend London’s Docklands Light Railway through Barking Riverside, crucial

to the start of this key generation scheme in Thames Gateway. Corby still lacks a passenger rail service, despite being a target for regeneration and an important part of the sustainable communities plan. The examples could be multiplied; the evidence is that the Department for Transport, again dominated by highway engineers, is simply not part of the government’s regeneration agenda.

Communities Minister David Miliband recently said, “All departments should be regeneration departments.” That must equally apply in central government, where we need far greater integration between the ODPM and the Department for Transport in particular, and in our city administrations.

The challenge is to produce urban environments as good as those in Amsterdam and Copenhagen, Freiburg or Strasbourg. There is no reason why we should lag so far behind the best practice of our neighbours.

Money for investment is one key. In French cities like Strasbourg and Nantes, resources are found to support new tram routes that underpin regeneration; there is joined-up urban policy. Reintegrating the different parts of the urban transport system is another: bus quality contracts are a start, but very far from the seamless-web philosophy that is needed. Re-educating the engineers, and creating a new profession of urban transport designers capable of producing efficient and elegant urban environments, is a third. Good transport planning and good urban design go hand in hand.

Challenges

?Too much emphasis is given to the delivery of quantity rather than the benefits of quality. Even when experienced designers are involved in a regeneration project, the brief often undervalues the benefits of design.

?High quality design is not integrated or hardwired into the procurement and delivery process of regeneration projects. ?The attention given to design quality varies too much across Government departments, their agencies and local authorities.

Although built to higher density, the poor design of this development in Appleton, Warrington, does little to convey a sense of place and public transport connections are poor.

6

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance ?Ministers, mayors, local authority leaders and cabinets

receive too little good advice on design.

?Public sector clients lack the necessary skills to give

significance to design quality from inception to realisation.

Major public clients do not have design champions at

board or cabinet level or in executive positions, and do

not possess the appropriate design expertise to promote,

evaluate and deliver well-designed developments.

?We lack clearly structured decision making bodies of a

manageable size to get things done.

?Development briefs for key urban sites are poorly

structured, often giving more importance to short term

commercial value than the creation of an integrated urban

vision to bring long term economic benefit.

?Too often, design is imposed on communities rather than

involving them. Community groups and local

representatives are still excluded from the decision-making

process and are not adequately supported by professional

facilitators. They are rarely involved by client groups in the

development of design briefs and are often excluded from

selection panels.

?There are insufficient mechanisms in place to ensure that

housebuilders and developers follow through to deliver

high quality schemes once they have acquired land from

public sector agencies.

?There is too often a separation between the design team

appointed to carry out the masterplan and another design

team charged with delivering the detailed design of

individual units and places. It is a fragmented process that

creates fragmented environments.

?The competitive bidding process is not used to the full

and is failing to provide opportunities for emerging design

talent in the UK and abroad to invest their design skills in

complex regeneration schemes across the UK.

?Design quality is threatened by an excessive reliance on

design codes rather than design professionals.

?While there have been welcome moves in some cities

and boroughs to rebalance the relationship between

vehicles and people by prioritising pedestrians, there

is still much to be done.

?Space continues to be wasted thanks to overly demanding

highway standards and sprawling road layouts, despite

explicit guidance requiring Local Authorities to review

their standards.

?The poor design and lack of coordination of street

furniture too often impedes its function and reduces the

aesthetic value of its surroundings.

Vision

In our vision, high quality design is a central objective for

public bodies responsible for delivering regeneration and is

entrenched in the delivery of private sector residential

communities. Public space takes priority over the car, well

designed and complementary public and private realms

create a sense of place, and the built environment is fertile

ground in which communities can flourish.

Recommendations

Design quality and procurement

?Integrate and hard-wire quality of design of buildings and

public spaces into public institutions by placing design

champions or advisers at strategic board or cabinet level

and making design quality a corporate objective.

?Review the Government’s tasking framework and funding

agreements for all relevant public bodies to make

design a central component and require regular reports

on delivery. Use the comprehensive performance

assessment to do similar for local authorities.

?Improve the quality of independent design advice

available to ministers, mayors, local authority leaders

and cabinets in ways that complement the role of CABE

in the planning process.

?Insist that existing design competitions guidance

(e.g. Commissioning a Sustainable and Well-Designed

City: a Guide to Competitive Selection of Architects and

Urban Designers, GLA Architecture + Urbanism Unit,

July 2005) is followed in all regeneration projects which

receive public funding, ensuring open and transparent

procurement and high quality design briefs. A majority

of design competition jurors should be architects or

design professionals.

?Ensure that design quality is delivered throughout the

lifetime of urban design developments. For larger sites,

commission spatial masterplans for the wider area, invite Communal space is integral to the design of this development in

Malmo Western Harbour, Sweden.

1 Design excellence7

8

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Started in the late 1990s, the Greenwich Millennium Village in London’s Greenwich Peninsula shows how good results can match high expectations when a proper commissioning process is in place.Masterplanning by Erskine Tovatt.

developers to bid for individual sites on the basis of a design proposal, not just a financial offer, and evaluate tenders on the basis of design quality and long term value-for-money, not solely on short term financial considerations.

?Develop mechanisms that ensure public participation and involvement in the development of urban vision statements. Promote the involvement of professional facilitators to support community groups and qualified designers at key stages of project development and implementation alongside landowners, developers and project sponsors.

?Place an architect or allied professional in a key advisory position within the Olympic Delivery Authority.

Transport

?Fund and prioritise public transport based on its potential to contribute to a fully rounded urban renaissance, not just on a transport business case or simplistic job creation arguments.

?Extend the “London-type” bus franchising system to the rest of the country, so that certainty can be

introduced into public transport planning and delivery.This will enable developers and regeneration agencies to have some confidence in the public transport systems around which they are being asked to structure higher-density mixed use development.Franchising is also virtually the only way of ensuring integrated services, ticketing and fares.

?Enforce the requirement set five years ago that Local Authorities should review all highways and parking

standards in the light of planning guidance on housing. ?Review how public transport and Highways Agency decision making can be integrated more closely into

sub regional masterplanning to recognise, encourage and enable comprehensive regeneration.

?Draft new design guidance for highway engineers and traffic planners that gives priority to the needs of pedestrians and demands a safe, high quality environment without imposing a rules-based recipe for over-engineering.

?Involve utility companies earlier in the planning process so they can take responsibility for a strategic approach rather than being presented with problems to tackle in too short a timeframe.

Skills, research and education

?Tackle the lack of urban design skills within local authorities by strengthening the role of the Regional Centres of Excellence for Sustainable Communities,developing a close working partnership between it and the Leadership Centre for Local Government, and ensuring they complement, rather than overlap with, the Academy for Sustainable Communities in Leeds.?Ensure public agencies and local authorities procure and manage a high-quality design and development process by insisting they follow appropriate advice from CABE.

?Task an independent review team to scrutinise the formal education process followed by design

professionals and recommend changes to ensure a more integrated approach to planning, architecture,landscaping and the social and ecological environments. ?Dedicate a greater proportion of government research funding into the quality of the built environment and the public realm, rather than focusing on construction methods and costs.

2 Social wellbeing 9

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Introduction

Cities drive prosperity and provide access to services.

They bring diverse people together and offer shared spaces,experiences and amenities such as parks and libraries,schools and transport. These assets offer opportunities to people on low incomes and drive the growth of cities as magnets for the young seeking better lives. Even at their lowest ebb, our declining cities offered these benefits and continued to attract many hopeful migrants while failing to retain the more established and more successful.

Progress

The revival of our cities has been driven by economic recovery and the steady expansion of jobs since 1993.

Although unemployment and economic inactivity in deprived neighbourhoods are far above national average levels, most cities have experienced sharp falls in unemployment. Major regional cities such as Leeds and Manchester now boast growing numbers of highly skilled jobs. The Government’s plans to move more of its key offices out of London should encourage this trend.

Economic recovery took longer in areas where previous decline had been steeper, such as Northern and Midlands cities, but significant growth in the number of jobs has in the main led to falling poverty. Families with children have further benefited through child tax credits and those in low paid jobs from working tax credits. Inequality between those on the lowest incomes and those of middle incomes has reduced somewhat as a result, but the incomes of those at the top have continued to move away from the rest.There are signs of neighbourhood recovery where

neighbourhood management and careful reinvestment measures have been applied intensively. Council stock

transfer in cities such as Bradford, Manchester and Liverpool has attracted resources and stimulated investment in

renewal. Strong opposition to demolition plans for run-down Victorian terraces all over the North stems in part from improvements to the fabric of these inner city areas, which were previously considered ‘out of bounds’. Sheffield,Birmingham, Manchester, Liverpool, Leeds and Glasgow have all attracted working incomers and held onto previously declining communities, refuting the view that inner urban areas are “clapped out”, obsolete and in terminal decline.A focus on revaluing existing communities, in London and other popular smaller cities around the country such as Edinburgh, Durham, Chester and York is leading to creative infill developments, mixed tenure, better transport and competitive alternatives to out of town shopping. In many ways, cities are making a comeback and extreme social polarisation is no longer accelerating as it was in the 1980s and 1990s.

Other specific advances have been made since the original report of the Urban Task Force six years ago:

?Over half of all social housing is now owned by housing associations, increasing the potential for significant

investment, upgrading and intensive management. Arm’s length structures are proving their value through better neighbourhood conditions.

?Local authority performance ratings have shown an upward trend, and local authorities are playing a bigger

2

Social wellbeing

Imaginative infill

development, such as this example in Coptic Street, Camden, can help lead to more mixed and integrated communities.This development

of 23maisonettes and flats was designed by Avanti Architects for a housing association.

10

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

role in controlling and managing urban environments by using powers to tackle mismanagement of private property such as Empty Dwelling Management Orders and selective licensing of private landlords. Neighbourhood management is proving popular and successful and many alternative local partnerships to deliver regeneration are emerging.?Crime prevention and increased supervision measures are having a positive impact – visible growth in street policing and the number of neighbourhood wardens makes people,particularly mothers with children, feel safer. The Government’s financial and political investment in

addressing antisocial behaviour has involved communities across the country, equipping them with resources and clout to deal with local problems.

?The Leadership Centre for Local Government has been established to help meet the leadership training needs of politicians and senior officers.

?Thanks to local authority-led Local Area Agreements,management responsibilities for delivery are now clearer,allowing partners to work together more effectively.

Challenges

?Cities are stark reminders of massive https://www.doczj.com/doc/7f10652680.html,petition for space in a crowded country pushes up prices for housing, making access for lower income households much harder. As wealth expands, this problem becomes more intense for those at the bottom of the social ladder.

?Household fragmentation into predominantly one and two person, childless households makes it impossible to build the type of home people aspire to for everyone. Attempting to do so is a recipe for cheaply built, low quality, quick fix

supply in areas like the Thames Gateway and the outer surrounds of all our big industrial conurbations.

?New build housing outside the city is heavily subsidised and attracts out mainly white, moderate income households causing a deepening racial and social

polarisation. The big exodus of certain social and ethnic groups from cities is creating growing racial segregation within them. It reflects poor performance of schools,environmental neglect and fear and insecurity in poorer inner city areas in spite of some improvements. Our

challenge is to ensure that cities are net attractors and that they both attract and retain a diverse and balanced

community. The biggest challenge is to hold onto working families.

?Despite progress in some areas, ethnic polarisation in the poorest areas has intensified. Newham, Hackney,Tower Hamlets and Barking exemplify this process in the Thames Gateway and have strongly growing ethnic minority communities, causing major community tensions and the rise of extremist groups. Birmingham, Leicester and Bradford all have growing minority-dominated

neighbourhoods and many schools have close to 100%intake from different non-white minorities. Too little real work is going on to help integrate distinct communities and virtually nothing to hold onto existing residents. Very often policy works directly against integration through housing over-supply in declining regions and insensitivity in targeted lettings.

?Families in more disadvantaged urban areas feel under immense pressure from crime, youth disorder,

environmental decay, traffic pollution, unsupervised poorly maintained parks and a loss of local shops, play spaces and other services. These neighbourhood problems are intensified through concentrations of disadvantaged

households including lone parent families, households with no earners and those with poor educational backgrounds,particularly in the large Council estates that still dominate many inner city neighbourhoods. Moves to demolish and replace them are increasingly problematic as the need for affordable, accessible “social” housing in cities does not go away. Cities like Birmingham are stuck with this problem.

?There are fewer failing schools now than at the time of the original Urban Task Force report. But, despite the City Academy programme, steps to improve urban schools through Excellence in Cities and the Building Schools for the Future programme, schools yet to improve place families under enormous strain.

?The Government is committed to creating sustainable communities, but funding is skewed heavily towards

new building and new communities while the infrastructure funding available for these is insufficient to support truly

The Chatham Maritime development includes three purpose built play areas for younger children on St Mary’s Island. Families in many other urban neighbourhoods feel under pressure from unsupervised,poorly maintained parks and a loss of local shops, play spaces and other services.

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

integrated and sustainable development. This biases growth towards already over-congested areas and accelerates the destruction of existing communities.

?The trend towards even bigger housing associations driven by development ambitions is diluting the commitment to community involvement that was the hallmark of good management. Many smaller associations perform better on this front, but funding drifts to larger scale organisations.

?Problematic local authorities struggle to improve neighbourhood conditions yet resist diversification of delivery which they perceive as a loss of control. Many plans are clumsy, insensitive, rushed, funding driven and wasteful. This applies particularly in Housing Market Renewal and growth areas.

?Scarce revenue funding may impact heavily on future Revenue Support Grant settlements for local councils, which could affect their ability to fulfil their strengthened economic, social and environmental urban management duties.

?There is a much greater need for youth provision and support for families with internal problems. Government support for community level action is fragmented, confusing and increasingly dilute. Too little action on social and community divisions, particularly on ethnic lines, means that inter-ethnic tensions are growing in poorer, fast changing communities. Building out is no solution.?Despite some successes, neighbourhood and suburban shopping and community centres are failing in many places and need a much more creative approach.

?The need for Government to fund new infrastructure through Section 106 agreements may result in too small

a pot of development gain resources being channelled towards social amenities.

Vision

In a densely populated and built up country like Britain, we have to value existing communities and infrastructure if our environment is to remain intact and our social systems are to hold communities together. In our vision, we create imaginative new housing through infill development leading to more mixed, more integrated communities; we convert and upgrade existing buildings thereby revaluing older decaying inner areas; we restore and manage parks and open spaces with ground level supervision in order to encourage families to stay in cities; and we introduce neighbourhood management to every urban neighbourhood to integrate services, make every street safe and attractive and retain a mixture of ethnic and income groups in all urban communities.Recommendations

?To ensure communities are mixed in terms of tenure, income and ethnicity:

–set a target to transform all social housing estates into mixed tenure communities by 2012.

–Use the many small unused sites within already built

up areas to increase the supply of affordable housing

close to local amenities and open space by using public funds to lever a variety of housing types of different

scales, costs and sizes that respond to the needs,

aspirations and budgets of ordinary households.

–improve city conditions through better schools, greater policing and more neighbourhood management.

–renovate, modernise and build in-fill housing within

the existing city framework by reshaping units and

adding new high quality units to older neighbourhoods.

?Rebalance the incentive for repairing and restoring existing properties with the incentive to build anew

so that the housing market renewal programmes in

the Midlands and the North really do re-value cities

and towns.

?Re-value and upgrade inner suburbs, which comprise

at least half of our current housing stock, with conversions, additions and improvements to make

them more usable and attractive, thereby effectively expanding and enhancing the supply of moderately priced homes.

?Empower local authorities in a strategic, co-ordinating role while encouraging them to involve voluntary and community organisations to a greater extent in service delivery, so introducing more contestability in the delivery of services at the local level.

?Involve residents more directly in making the key decisions about priorities for services and how they should be delivered within local areas.

?Increase provision for young people through a major reinvestment in youth services including sport, supervised open space and imaginative use of the arts and music.

?Ensure Local Area Agreements provide local solutions to local needs by extending their freedoms and flexibilities and resisting overly centralised control.

?Extend the Comprehensive Performance Assessment

to assess whether local authorities are leading the social, physical and environmental improvement of their cities.

2 Social wellbeing11

12

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Introduction

Climate change has emerged as the greatest threat to our planet’s future. Carbon dioxide emissions, increased energy consumption, pollution, deforestation, water contamination and the protection of biodiversity are pressing challenges facing the developed and developing world. If the United Kingdom is to demonstrate a national commitment to environmental responsibility, we need a coordinated response to these challenges that protects the natural environment, contains urban sprawl and reduces energy use and waste.

The ecological balance of our nation depends on the shape of our towns and cities and the protection of our valuable countryside. In a country with limited land and resources we can only maintain this balance if we use our urban assets better. Where we must accommodate growth outside our towns and cities, we must do so in a way that will not have negative impacts on the social, physical and environmental balance of existing urban centres.

People increasingly recognise the need to live and work in a good quality environment and are more aware of the long term damage caused by badly-located, land-hungry and car-dependent settlements. Pressure for development places huge demands on the environment – and will

continue to do so – but, properly done, new development can create attractive, successful, sustainable places that are well located, carefully designed and conducive to public transport, walking and cycling. It can provide important opportunities to recycle and re-use brownfield sites, tackle contamination, improve environmental standards and enhance rather than diminish our natural and cultural heritage. In this way, successful urban renewal will help address some of the most important environmental challenges of our times.

Progress

Since the original Task Force report six years ago, the

Government has set a target to reduce carbon emissions by 60% by 2050. Since buildings produce 50% of emissions,and urban sprawl and congestion are major drivers of energy

use, urban regeneration is an essential element in policies designed to meet that target. So, it is a welcome sign that progress has been made to improve the environmental

performance of existing and new buildings; from April 2006all publicly funded new homes should respect a new code to make them more sustainable. And, it is good news that positive steps have been taken to make better use of land;the density of new residential development has risen to 40dwellings per hectare and the share of development on brownfield sites to 70%.

But, while Government has made welcome progress in recognising the wider environmental costs of development,it needs to be more aware of the hazards climate change is likely to create and the need to plan flexible approaches to cope with them. Such hazards include damage to infrastructure, fluctuations in water supplies, flooding from extreme events and contamination of all kinds,

with associated effects on local and regional economies.

3

Environmental responsibility

Sustainability must lie at the root of original design concepts. This building in Bow, East London, by ZEDfactory Ltd.

(https://www.doczj.com/doc/7f10652680.html,) has been built to ZEDstandards. This means the levels of insulation and thermal mass are such that no central heating system is required. It shows how a Zero Fossil Energy

Development can be delivered on a tight urban site as a conventional development opportunity. The sale prices for the flats achieved by the developer were well above local comparables, showing there is a healthy appetite for sustainable housing in the marketplace.

3 Environmental responsibility 13

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Steps are being taken to meet demand for new housing and address the polarisation of assets that occurs when only those with inherited wealth can afford to buy a place to live.But there are fears that not all the lessons of the urban renaissance are being put into practice. The environment still feels marginal to the Sustainable Communities Plan and there is growing anxiety about the Plan’s overall cost financially, socially and politically. Local communities face development that appears to be imposed on them from outside with too little care and attention given to their views about what matters in their local environment. Opportunities to make better use of urban land, and thus reduce transport-related emissions, are being missed and environmental standards in refurbishment and new building are still not respected and need enforcement.

The Urban Task Force and Urban White Paper recommended that wherever possible brownfield development should be prioritised over greenfield development. Adherence to this principle has greatly improved the quality of some of our cities and is fundamental to the concept of compact,

sustainable, well-connected, vital and secure communities.However, although the Government should do all it can to facilitate development on difficult urban sites, there are circumstances where housing demand and the need for greater choice can only be satisfied in areas outside cities rather than on over-constrained brownfield land, which may be poorly connected by public transport, be located close to disruptive facilities or be too highly contaminated to allow affordable development. In these cases, housing development should be encouraged in growth corridors which adhere to the core principles of compact, well-designed and well-connected neighbourhoods.

In our view, the latest reviews to planning guidance have placed undue emphasis on market factors in determining the volume and location of new housing development. In areas designated for high numbers of new homes, developers will be able to bring forward both greenfield and brownfield sites,perversely weakening the brownfield-first approach in those areas of most rapid growth. It is also concerning that pro-active urban capacity studies are being replaced by housing land availability studies. If overdevelopment were to continue outside cities, there is a risk that this could have a negative impact on the significant progress made to date on inner city revitalisation.

Challenges

?It is widely accepted that carefully placed growth is required to meet demand for new housing. Every

opportunity must be taken that when development does occur in growth areas, it creates compact, well-designed,sustainable neighbourhoods, well served by transport,

hospitals, schools and other amenities, which do not undermine existing communities or the wider benefit of the urban renaissance.

?Market considerations risk distorting future planning decisions in the fastest growing parts of the country in ways that obstruct social and environmental goals and move away from a brownfield first approach.

?There is room to improve and better enforce targets for re-using brownfield land and increasing density.?Opportunities for improving environmental quality and the standards of new development are being missed.?The true cost of greenfield development, in particular of providing the necessary infrastructure, is not yet fully recognised.

?Fuel poverty is exacerbated by inadequate design and improvement of lower income accommodation.

?There is very little priority given to the environmental importance of regenerating existing communities and improving existing housing to the highest eco-standards.Urban developers, rural campaign groups, environmentalists and those who care about deprived communities have a shared interest in seeing these challenges met.

Vision

Our vision is of a planning system that takes every

opportunity to use brownfield before greenfield sites; of a regeneration, recycling and reinvestment approach to existing homes and communities; of new high-density

Lily Ponds in Drainer’s Dyke, Wicken Fen. With the support of partners including the ODPM, the National Trust is expanding its Wicken Fen nature reserve ten-fold, turning it into a mini National Park for the growing city of Cambridge. Doing so shows how the interests of people and wildlife can be interwoven in long-term planning for growth.

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

developments that meet the highest energy efficiency standards; of buildings and neighbourhoods designed

in such a way as to reduce resource consumption

and pollution; of communities served by high quality environmental infrastructure; and of a development process that engages communities and encourages a sustainable approach from the public and private sector bodies that play a part.

Recommendations

Growth areas and brownfield development

?Agree a vision for growth areas based on strengthening existing urban areas, the retention of neighbourhood communities and the provision of good public transport.

?Exploit all opportunities for an urban renaissance by taking a brownfield first approach, including in growth areas, and recognise the continuing substantial role of windfall sites in contributing to land supply and of urban capacity studies in identifying future opportunities.

?Increase the share of new building on brownfield sites across the country by establishing a new target for an average 75% of residential development across all England’s regions to be on previously developed land by 2010, supported by varying targets for brownfield use in Regional Spatial Strategies to reflect regional differences in supply and demand.

?Draw on local community views by making character assessments of historic and landscape value compulsory and integral to regional and sub-regional planning and the development of growth areas.Density and green space

?Raise the minimum density standard for new residential development to 40 dwellings per hectare, subject to exceptional circumstances, and extend the “density direction”, which requires all lower density housing development to be notified to the Government Regional Office for possible call-in, from three to all English regions.

?Increase investment in the creation and long term management of green infrastructure and open spaces

in growth areas and areas of existing deficiency.

Sustainability through design

?Extend the national Code for Sustainable Buildings to

all new housing developments by the end of 2006 and extend similar measures to existing buildings.

?Ensure sustainability not only lies at the root of original design concepts, but is followed as a philosophy through to deconstruction.

?Support innovation and investment in environmental infrastructure – including zero waste, combined heat

and power and sustainable urban drainage schemes.

?Place an energy efficiency obligation on developers that matches the obligation placed on utilities.

?Recognise the huge energy and recycling potential embodied by our 22 million existing homes, the vast majority of which are structurally sound and potentially re-usable.

14

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Introduction

Private sector institutional investment is an essential part of the regeneration package. To bring this powerful force to bear, public and private sectors must recognise their shared interest, understand their complementary abilities and know the different frameworks within which each makes decisions. Institutional attitudes to investment in regeneration areas are changing, but continued investment relies on providing appropriate fiscal encouragements and removing inappropriate legal deterrents.

Progress

Since 1999 there have been some significant changes in the legal and delivery frameworks operating in regeneration areas, and a corresponding substantial increase in private sector institutional investment vehicles.

The balance between risk and reward in deprived and regeneration areas is now better understood. Two key studies, one for the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, Economic and Social Research Council and Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors by the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee and Ulster and one for Morley, Igloo and English Partnerships by the Investment Property Databank, have shown that investing in deprived areas can provide returns as good as those available from prime areas and that regeneration areas can outperform prime areas by 20%. Consequently, urban regeneration has become a significantly higher priority for institutional investors. The first regional regeneration investment company, as recommended by the Urban Task Force, has recently been set up in the East Midlands.

The Government has introduced a number of tax incentives. Measures to encourage Living over the Shop, remediation allowances and Stamp Duty Land Tax reductions in deprived areas have been positive steps.

Policy has also moved on in the detailed technical areas of planning gain, compulsory purchase and land remediation in ways recommended by the Urban Task Force. Compulsory Purchase Orders are again being used in areas like Ancoats in East Manchester, the redevelopment of Hastings and

in the Lower Lea Valley in the Thames Gateway. This has helped the many new area based delivery vehicles, including the New Deal for Community Areas, Urban Development Corporations, Urban Regeneration Companies and Housing Market Renewal areas. In addition, programmes such as the Coalfields Programme and the Millennium Communities are successfully turning round deprived communities. Local authorities have been given powers to advance the social, economic and environmental wellbeing of their communities.

In conjunction with the Better Regulation Task Force, progress has been made on simplifying the licensing system for remediation processes on site. The difficulty created by the Van de Walle case – concerning the definition of when soils are ‘waste’ – has led to a joint initiative to agree on the definition, and some progress has been made on the vexed question of the soil guideline values (SGVs). Whilst these are small steps, they are essential to reduce costs and speed up the process of cleaning up contaminated sites.

Challenges

?Private investment is limited by a significant shortfall in public investment from:

–the lack of an effective gap funding or rental guarantee

system;

–the Regional Development Agencies being directed

towards funding economic development rather than

regeneration;

–English Partnerships redirecting its activity to the growth areas in the south east; and

–European funding reducing after 2006.

?The plethora of overlapping, but differently funded and monitored, area based regeneration bodies has reduced the delivery effectiveness of public sector led regeneration schemes. This has been exacerbated by the disconnection of regeneration expenditure between Government Regional Offices, Regional Development Agencies and English Partnerships and the huge number of new ineffective partnerships at local and sub-regional levels, particularly in areas like the Thames Gateway. This not

4

Delivery, fiscal and legal frameworks

4 Delivery, fiscal and legal frameworks15

only dilutes the effective use of money but also reduces the vision to mediocrity.

?The confusing sponsorship and funding arrangements

of the Regional Development Agencies – through which they are 85% funded by ODPM but sponsored by the

DTI – have led them to focus on economic development, jobs and growth rather than high quality, well-designed, sustainable urban development.

?The Urban Regeneration Companies that have been established lack the powers they need to fulfil their crucial role.

?While the democratic deficit is being addressed, short-term local political horizons have resulted in compromise rather than excellence and have militated against the longer-term view required to deliver quality, sustainable schemes.

?Legal and fiscal changes have not yet generated the incentives and controls to deliver the urban renaissance. The incentives continue to favour greenfield over sustainable brownfield development when VAT, the lack

of public investment in infrastructure, the new local authority growth incentive and planning gain are all

taken into account.

?The ability to strategically plan coherent urban areas is limited by the piecemeal way in which land is made available for development. Rather than designating an area and setting out clearly what will be delivered and when, the public sector is constantly on the back foot, intervening as and when land becomes available.

?Changes in leasehold enfranchisement have discriminated against vertical mixed use and changes in the financial accounting frameworks for regeneration bodies have made their all important land assembly function substantially more difficult.

?Compulsory Purchase Orders in regeneration areas are still difficult to achieve. This occurs particularly where the

sites in existing neighbourhoods needing acquisition are small, fragmented and expensive to develop, such as in Manchester’s Northern Quarter.

?The implementation of the Landfill Directive has considerably increased the costs associated with building and land clean up to such an extent that many more sites are now marginal and consequently not being bought forward by the landowner. The part 11A contaminated land legislation is still lacking comprehensive guidance, with values being issued for threshold soil toxicity levels

without detail on how they are to be used. This is leading

to unnecessarily high standards of clean up, which when coupled with the effects of the Landfill Directive increase costs to an even greater degree.

?Lower income households suffer disincentives to repair

due to VAT on all reinvestment.

Vision

Our vision is of one, clearly recognisable and empowered, regeneration delivery body, with a skilled management team. This agency is area based and combines all the relevant

public funding streams and executive powers to act. Its remit is to assemble land early and quickly, incentivise private investment, ensure design excellence, engage local communities, deliver substantial social, economic and environmental benefits and share in the increased values created in the long term. To achieve this we make the following recommendations:

Recommendations

General

?Ensure that any publicly owned land released to the

market (e.g. redundant military, NHS or rail property)

is assessed for sustainable development and is not

sold on the basis of financial considerations alone.

Property returns in deprived areas

Investment Property Databank

research for Morley, Igloo and

English Partnerships has shown

that investing in deprived areas can

provide returns as good as those

available from prime areas. A

separate study undertaken by the

Universities of Ulster, Aberdeen and

Dundee found that regeneration areas

can outperform prime areas by 20%.

16

4 Delivery, fiscal and legal frameworks17

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Postscript

This report has examined the progress made towards an urban renaissance in England’s towns and cities. It has set out the practical steps we feel are needed to make the original vision of the Urban Task Force a reality.

While our recommendations are largely targeted at central Government, realising the vision they support is not only the responsibility of politicians and civil servants. Delivering on policy promises and campaigning for change will require the energy and commitment of a wide range of people. Not just those who work in regeneration, or even those who live and work in cities, but those who recognise urban renewal can deliver a safer and more sustainable future for all of us, today and for generations to come.

This is a critical time for urban regeneration. We hope this report will stimulate debate, help shape future policy, and encourage others to join a concerted effort to strengthen the urban renaissance.

18

19

Towards a Strong Urban Renaissance

Urban Task Force

Lord Rogers of Riverside Chairman

Chris Brown Chief Executive, Igloo Regeneration

Richard Burdett LSE Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism Tony Burton

Director of Policy and Strategy, The National Trust Alan Cherry CBE DL Chairman, Countryside Properties plc.Martin Crookston

Director, Llewelyn Davies Yeang

Anthony Dunnett CBE President, International Health Partners (UK) Ltd

Sir Peter Hall*Bartlett Professor of Planning, University College London Phil Kirby Managing Director, National Grid Property David Lunts Director of Policy and Partnerships, GLA Anthony Mayer Chief Executive, GLA

Anne Power

Professor of Social Policy, LSE

Wendy Thomson CBE Director, McGill University School of Social Work Sir Crispin Tickell Chancellor, University of Kent Lorna Walker

Director, Lorna Walker Consulting

Some of these original Task Force members were not able to participate in the drafting sessions for this report but endorse its contents.

Acknowledgments

*Footnote by Professor Sir Peter Hall

Though I am in total and enthusiastic agreement with colleagues on the great majority of this report, I regret that I cannot support certain arguments and recommendations of Chapter 3. My reasons are set out in two recent publications 1.

In summary: I believe there is no overriding need to save greenfield land, of which we have a surplus in South East England; the case on sustainability grounds for further raising minimum densities is non-proven; the requirement to first develop brownfield land in the growth areas would in practice lead to inflexibility which would almost certainly slow their development; present policies are already

inhibiting new housing completions and causing an unprecedented increase in apartment construction, unsuitable for families with children and undesired by potential residents.

I am therefore concerned that the proposals on brownfield and densities, however well-intentioned, would – if implemented –deepen the well-documented housing crisis that faces us and our government.

1

The Land Fetish (TCPA Tomorrow Series, Paper 16, 2005) and “Aux Armes –

Against Housing Disaster” (Town and Country Planning, 74, October 2005, 288-290).

https://www.doczj.com/doc/7f10652680.html,

托福考试口语模板(万能)

托福口语万能模板 为了让同学们在短期内可以快速有效地提高托福口语水平，天道小编特为大家搜集整理了一些比较常用、比较简单的托福口语模板，希望对大家复习托福口语备考有所帮助。 Q1 Personally, I would like to say that my favorite is … And there are a couple of reasons to name. The most important thing is that… What’s more… So that’s why Q2 Well, in my opinion, I would definitely agree with the point that… The first reason I want to say is that… More importantly… So, that’s why I choose… for the two reasons listed above Personally speaking, I prefer… for several reasons. I think …is more appropriate for… for several reasons. Firstly, … Besides, in my experience Bur probably the most important reason for my preference is that… In a word, that’s the reason of my preference./ that’s why my preference is… I think it is important to … For one thing, …. By doing… Another thing is the advantage of… As for… I agree that, but unless…, … Q3 The school has implemented a new policy that… due to… And the woman/man holds a positive/negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that… And the second one is based on the fact that…

初中语文古文赏析曹操《短歌行》赏析(林庚)

教育资料 《短歌行》 《短歌行》赏析(林庚) 曹操这一首《短歌行》是建安时代杰出的名作，它代表着人生的两面，一方面是人生的忧患，一方面是人生的欢乐。而所谓两面也就是人生的全面。整个的人生中自然含有一个生活的态度，这就具体地表现在成为《楚辞》与《诗经》传统的产儿。它一方面不失为《楚辞》中永恒的追求，一方面不失为一个平实的生活表现，因而也就为建安诗坛铺平了道路。 这首诗从“对酒当歌，人生几何”到“但为君故，沉吟至今”，充分表现着《楚辞》里的哀怨。一方面是人生的无常，一方面是永恒的渴望。而“呦呦鹿鸣”以下四句却是尽情的欢乐。你不晓得何以由哀怨这一端忽然会走到欢乐那一端去，转折得天衣无缝，仿佛本来就该是这么一回事似的。这才是真正的人生的感受。这一段如是，下一段也如是。“明明如月，何时可掇?忧从中来，不可断绝。越陌度阡，枉用相存。契阔谈宴，心念旧恩。月明星稀，乌鹊南飞。绕树三匝，何枝可依。”缠绵的情调，把你又带回更深的哀怨中去。但“山不厌高，海不厌深”，终于走入“周公吐哺，天下归心”的结论。上下两段是一个章法，但是你并不觉得重复，你只觉得卷在悲哀与欢乐的旋涡中，不知道什么时候悲哀没有了，变成欢乐，也不知道什么时候欢乐没有了，又变成悲哀，这岂不是一个整个的人生吗?把整个的人生表现在一个刹那的感觉上，又都归于一个最实在的生活上。“我有嘉宾，鼓瑟吹笙”，不正是当时的情景吗?“周公吐哺，天下归心”，不正是当时的信心吗? “青青子衿”到“鼓瑟吹笙”两段连贯之妙，古今无二。《诗经》中现成的句法一变而有了《楚辞》的精神，全在“沉吟至今”的点窜，那是“青青子衿”的更深的解释，《诗经》与《楚辞》因此才有了更深的默契，从《楚辞》又回到《诗经》，这样与《鹿鸣》之诗乃打成一片，这是一个完满的行程，也便是人生旅程的意义。“月明星稀”何以会变成“山不厌高，海不厌深”?几乎更不可解。莫非由于“明月出天山”，“海上生明月”吗?古辞说：“枯桑知天风，海水知天寒”，枯桑何以知天风，因为它高；海水何以知天寒，因为它深。唐人诗“一叶落知天下秋”，我们对于宇宙万有正应该有一个“知”字。然则既然是山，岂可不高?既然是海，岂可不深呢?“并刀如水，吴盐胜雪”，既是刀，就应该雪亮；既是盐，就应该雪白，那么就不必问山与海了。 山海之情，成为漫漫旅程的归宿，这不但是乌鹊南飞，且成为人生的思慕。山既尽其高，海既尽其深。人在其中乃有一颗赤子的心。孟子主尽性，因此养成他浩然之气。天下所以归心，我们乃不觉得是一个夸张。 .

托福口语task3-6

名师支招：新托福口语Task 3-6 完全攻略：征服新托福口语Task 3 “To succeed academically in English-speaking colleges and universities，students need to be able to combine all their English-language skills- in reading，listening，and speaking…”，所以在新托福口语task3中考生们首先遭遇了先读，再听，后说相结合的考试形式，虽然内容为较易理解的校园生活场景，但环环相扣的考试环节加上严格紧张的时间限制，不免给备考带来了种种压力。在本文中，笔者将根据Task 3 各个环节中经常出现的误区和问题进行探讨,并给出相应的解决方案，以助托福准考生们一臂之力。 一．怎样“读”? 误区：阅读部分考察“记忆”能力 相对于托福考试的阅读部分，Task3中只有75-100字的简短阅读材料简直是小巫见大巫。可正是因为这样，却偏偏激发了好多考生的“完美主义”心态，想要把所有内容统统记下，结果因小失大，笔记中过多的细节淹没了重点信息。其实Task3中阅读资料的真正作用是为听力提供背景，唯一的价值是告诉考生接下来的对话中两人谈论的政策或计划等是什么，所以不应浪费时间记过多细节。 支招：笔记中只需要notice/message/proposal (key words) + reasons(keywords)。其中关于政策的关键词多半出现在题目以及文章的前两行，而通过一些明显的“信号”也可以轻松找到给出理由的关键词。例如：(Official Guide P213)announcement 关键词位于第一行“increase tuition”，而通过“but itis necessary to increase them now for several reasons”和“we havealso…”可以找到并列关系的两组理由关键词“more students，additionalprofessors”和“laboratoryfacilities”。所以笔记可记做：学费（tuition）↑，学生（students）+，老师（professors）+，实验设备（labfacilities）+(可根据习惯中英符号相结合)。二．怎样“听”? 误区1：对话中的两个人都听 我们都知道在最终的口语表达中只需陈述其中一个人的态度及理由，所以两个说话者的信息都听无疑只会分散精力，并且另一个人所描述的信息也可能会被考生误引入到最后的口语表达中,违背题目要求给出错误信息。 支招：找出主角（leading speaker），只听一人 在听力对话一开始的时候不要着急记笔记，这样很容易无法分清主次。先把两个人的分别一句话听完，基本就可以分清主角和次角，因为，主角往往会持有很强烈的支持或反对态度，确定下主次以后，就可以专注只听一个人并记笔记了。误区2：听力对话考察“听写”能力 有的考生曾经抱怨说自己的笔记都快赶上听力原文了，可是分数却不尽如人意。其实这又是“完美主义”心态在作怪了。考生总是不放心，对话中的每一个细节列举都不放过，结果在口语表达时内容冗长，却依然会遗漏重点信息，而这正是Task3丢分的主要原因之一。托福口语考察的是抓住重点的能力，并不是考生的书写速度。 支招：笔记只需要记主角所给出的态度（赞成/反对）+reasons（key words） 在听力对话中寻找关键信息，快速识别信号词或信号句就显得更为重要，这是听力的必备技巧之一。例如在(Official GuideP214-215)，我们可以看到“But I can see why”，“ And the other thing is ”，“I’mdoing OK, but the facilities here are so limited.”这些明显的信号句所引出的关键信息，所以笔记可记为：many students（班级+），hard get personalattention （关注?），not job（工作难），facilities?equipment ?（设备?）out of date（过时） 三．怎样“说”? 误区：语速要快，尤其是在时间快结束时，这样才会多提供信息防止丢分。 考生在时间来不及时慌慌张张讲得飞快，是因为想把笔记中的内容讲完，但在托福考官看来“how clearly and coherentlyyou convey information is as important as how much information youconvey”（表达的清晰与连贯和表达内容的多少是一样重要的），仓促作答一定顾不得清晰与连贯，所以这样的表现往往会失分。 支招：备考时采用“计时录音”的方法进行练习。 如果平时练习时就有时间的概念，那么考试时对口语表达的内容长短就比较有把握了，练习越多，就越胸有成竹。这个

托福口语task1模板汇总

托福口语task1模板汇总 为了帮助大家顺利的通过托福口语模板考试，今天文都国际小编为同学们分享托福口语task1模板汇总，建议大家在备考的时候不妨练习一下哦。 托福口语task1模板：人 In my family, my mother has influenced me greatly because she has so many good qualities. She Is very well educated and keeps an open mind. Her thinking is very modern. She is able to understand people from different generations. In addition, she is a good listener. This makes her tolerant of other people’s opinions. Her personal values set a good example for me to follow in my own life. The way she treats people and thinks makes me want to become the best person I can be. And she helps me to keep a balance in my subjects and in my marks. She also tells me how to see the point of studying so many formulas and equations that seemed so abstract. This is why I think my mother has influenced me the most in my life。 托福口语task1模板：事件 My high school graduation is the most memorable event in my life because it was such a special day. During our graduation we were each called up one at a time to the stage. We each received our diploma and

满分托福口语模板

Q1 Personally, I would like to say that my favorite is … And there are a couple of reasons to name. The most important thing is that… What’s more… So that’s why Q2 Well, in my opinion, I would definitely agree with the point that… The first reason I want to say is that… More importantly…So, that’s why I choose…for the two reasons listed above Personally speaking, I prefer…for several reasons. I think …is more appropriate for…for several reasons. Firstly, … Besides, in my experience Bur probably the most important reason for my preference is that… In a word, that’s the reason of my preference./ that’s why my preference is… I think it is important to … For one thing, …. By doing… Another thing is the advantage of… As for…I agree that, but unless…, … Q3 The school has implemented a new policy that…due to… And the woman/man holds a positive/negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that… And the second one is based on the fact that… In the reading material, there is a/an announcement/message/notice/proposal about …The university/college is going to… In the listening material, two students discuss about the… The man/woman is against/supporting the… He or she feels unhappy/less satisfied about… thinks the…is unfair/inconvenient/unaffordable for the following reasons: Firstly, he thinks/says… Also, he points out that… In addition, in his opinion, … Q4 In the lecture, the professor mainly talked about the theory that… To reinforce the theory, the professor gave two reasons/examples in his speech. The first one is that… The other one is that… And that’s the two reasons/ examples the speaker presented to explain his idea. TYPE 1： The reading passage: definition Listening passage: examples, study, research

高中语文文言文曹操《短歌行(对酒当歌)》原文、翻译、赏析

曹操《短歌行【对酒当歌】》原文、翻译、赏析译文 原文 面对美酒应该高歌，人生短促日月如梭。对酒当歌，人生几何？ 好比晨露转瞬即逝，失去的时日实在太多！譬如朝露，去日苦多。 席上歌声激昂慷慨，忧郁长久填满心窝。慨当以慷，忧思难忘。 靠什么来排解忧闷？唯有狂饮方可解脱。何以解忧？唯有杜康。 那穿着青领（周代学士的服装）的学子哟，你们令我朝夕思慕。青青子衿，悠悠我心。 正是因为你们的缘故，我一直低唱着《子衿》歌。但为君故，沉吟至今。 阳光下鹿群呦呦欢鸣，悠然自得啃食在绿坡。呦呦鹿鸣，食野之苹。 一旦四方贤才光临舍下，我将奏瑟吹笙宴请宾客。我有嘉宾，鼓瑟吹笙。 当空悬挂的皓月哟，你运转着，永不停止；明明如月，何时可掇？ 我久蓄于怀的忧愤哟，突然喷涌而出汇成长河。忧从中来，不可断绝。 远方宾客踏着田间小路，一个个屈驾前来探望我。越陌度阡，枉用相存。 彼此久别重逢谈心宴饮，争着将往日的情谊诉说。契阔谈讌，心念旧恩。 明月升起，星星闪烁，一群寻巢乌鹊向南飞去。月明星稀，乌鹊南飞。 绕树飞了三周却没敛绕树三匝，何枝

翅，哪里才有它们栖身之 所？ 可依？ 高山不辞土石才见巍 峨，大海不弃涓流才见壮阔。（比喻用人要“唯才是举”，多多益善。）山不厌高，水不厌深。 只有像周公那样礼待贤 才（周公见到贤才，吐出口 中正在咀嚼的食物，马上接 待。《史记》载周公自谓： “一沐三握发，一饭三吐哺， 犹恐失天下之贤。”），才 能使天下人心都归向我。 周公吐哺，天 赏析 曹操是汉末杰出的政治家、军事家和文学家，他雅好诗章，好作乐府歌辞，今存诗22首，全是乐府诗。曹操的乐府诗多描写他本人的政治主张和统一天下的雄心壮志。如他的《短歌行》，充分表达了诗人求贤若渴以及统一天下的壮志。 《短歌行》是政治性很强的诗作，主要是为曹操当时所实行的政治路线和政策策略服务的，但是作者将政治内容和意义完全熔铸在浓郁的抒情意境之中，全诗充分发挥了诗歌创作的特长，准确而巧妙地运用了比兴手法，寓理于情，以情感人。诗歌无论在思想内容还是在艺术上都取得了极高的成就，语言质朴，立意深远，气势充沛。这首带有建安时代"志深比长""梗概多气"的时代特色的《短歌行》，读后不觉思接千载，荡气回肠，受到强烈的感染。 对酒当歌，人生几何？ 譬如朝露，去日苦多。 慨当以慷，幽思难忘。 何以解忧，唯有杜康。 青青子衿，悠悠我心。 但为君故，沈吟至今。 呦呦鹿鸣，食野之苹。 我有嘉宾，鼓瑟吹笙。 明明如月，何时可掇？ 忧从中来，不可断绝。 越陌度阡，枉用相存。 契阔谈，心念旧恩。 月明星稀，乌鹊南飞， 绕树三匝，何枝可依？ 山不厌高，海不厌深， 周公吐哺，天下归心。 《短歌行》是汉乐府的旧题，属于《相和歌?平调曲》。这就是说它本来是一个乐曲的名称，这种乐曲怎么唱法，现在当然是不知道了。但乐府《相和歌?平调曲》中除了《短歌行》还有《长歌行》，唐代吴兢《乐府古题要解》引证古诗“长歌正激烈”，魏文帝曹丕《燕歌行》“短歌微吟不能长”和晋代傅玄《艳歌行》“咄来长歌续短歌”等句，认为“长歌”、“短

2019年TPO20托福口语Task3原文及参考答案

2019年TPO20托福口语Task3原文及参考答案 TPO20口语Task3题目： Energy costs reach sky-high levels Heating prices, and the university’s heating bills, reached record-high levels this year. In an effort to reduce heating costs, the university plans to lower the temperature in all classroom buildings on weekends and on weekdays after five P.M., when the day’s classes have officially ended. Because classes will not be in session at these times, the reduced hear should have no negative impact on students and their studies. The university considers it essential that the cost-saving measures not interfere with student activities. ConversationNow listen to two students discussing the article. Woman： What on earth is the university thinking? Man： Huh? What do you mean? Woman：Well, those buildings aren’t just used for classes. That’s where my evening st udy group usually meets. Man：Oh, of course, that’s true. But you could go to the library instead. Woman： Yeah, but the library only has a few rooms that people can use for group meetings which is why classrooms are so convenient. But now, if it’s wint er and cold, where can we go?

2011新托福口语满分模板

2011新托福口语满分模板 Q1 Personally, I would like to say that my favorite is … And there are a couple of reasons to name. The most important thing is that… What’s more… So that’s why Q2 Well, in my opinion, I would definitely agree with the point that… The first reason I want to say is that… More importantly… So, that’s why I choose… for the two reasons listed above Personally speaking, I prefer… for several reasons. I think … is more appropriate for… for several reasons. Firstly, … Besides, in my experience Bur probably the most important reason for my preference is that… In a word, that’s the reason of my preference./ that’s why my preference is… I think it is important to … For one thing, …. By doing… Another thing is the advantage of… As for… I agree that, but unless…, … Q3 The school has implemented a new policy that… due to… And the woman/man holds a positive/negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that… And the second one is based on the fact that… In the reading material, there is a/an announcement/message/notice/proposal about … The university/college is going to… In the listening material, two students discuss about the… The man/woman is against/supporting th e… He or she feels unhappy/less satisfied about… thinks the… is unfair/inconvenient/unaffordable for the following reasons: Firstly, he thinks/says… Also, he points out that… In addition, in his opinion, … Q4 In the lecture, the professor mainly talked ab out the theory that… To reinforce the theory, the professor gave two reasons/examples in his speech. The first one is that… The other one is that…

新托福口语考试模版

新托福口语考试Task 1模版 Personally, I would have to say that, um, the person that I admire most / a valuable possession I want to talk about / the place I would most like to go is ______________. And there are a couple of reasons to name. The most important thing is that, you know, ____________________.What’s more, ____________________. So that’s why ____________________. 新托福口语考试Task 2模版 Well, in my opinion, I would definitely agree with the point that, um, ____________________.The first reason that I wanna say is that____________________. More importantly, ____________________. So, uh, that’s why I choose ____________________ for the two reasons listed above. 新托福口语考试Task 3模版 The school has implemented a new policy that________________due to ____________________. And the man/woman holds a positive / negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that____________________. And the second one is based on the fact that____________________. Therefore, s/he agrees/disagrees with that opinion. 新托福口语考试Task 4模版 In the lecture, the professor mainly talked about the theory that____________________. To reinforce the theory, the professor gave two examples / reasons in his speech. The first one is that____________________. The other one is that____________________.

曹操《短歌行》其二翻译及赏析

曹操《短歌行》其二翻译及赏析 引导语：曹操(155—220)，字孟德，小名阿瞒，《短歌行 二首》 是曹操以乐府古题创作的两首诗， 第一首诗表达了作者求贤若渴的心 态，第二首诗主要是曹操向内外臣僚及天下表明心迹。 短歌行 其二 曹操 周西伯昌，怀此圣德。 三分天下，而有其二。 修奉贡献，臣节不隆。 崇侯谗之，是以拘系。 后见赦原，赐之斧钺，得使征伐。 为仲尼所称，达及德行， 犹奉事殷，论叙其美。 齐桓之功，为霸之首。 九合诸侯，一匡天下。 一匡天下，不以兵车。 正而不谲，其德传称。 孔子所叹，并称夷吾，民受其恩。 赐与庙胙，命无下拜。 小白不敢尔，天威在颜咫尺。 晋文亦霸，躬奉天王。 受赐圭瓒，钜鬯彤弓， 卢弓矢千，虎贲三百人。 威服诸侯，师之所尊。 八方闻之，名亚齐桓。 翻译 姬昌受封为西伯，具有神智和美德。殷朝土地为三份，他有其中两分。 整治贡品来进奉，不失臣子的职责。只因为崇侯进谗言，而受冤拘禁。 后因为送礼而赦免， 受赐斧钺征伐的权利。 他被孔丘称赞， 品德高尚地位显。 始终臣服殷朝帝王，美名后世流传遍。齐桓公拥周建立功业，存亡继绝为霸 首。

聚合诸侯捍卫中原，匡正天下功业千秋。号令诸侯以匡周室，主要靠的不是 武力。 行为磊落不欺诈，美德流传于身后。孔子赞美齐桓公，也称赞管仲。 百姓深受恩惠，天子赐肉与桓公，命其无拜来接受。桓公称小白不敢，天子 威严就在咫尺前。 晋文公继承来称霸，亲身尊奉周天王。周天子赏赐丰厚，仪式隆重。 接受玉器和美酒，弓矢武士三百名。晋文公声望镇诸侯，从其风者受尊重。 威名八方全传遍，名声仅次于齐桓公。佯称周王巡狩，招其天子到河阳，因 此大众议论纷纷。 赏析 《短歌行》 (“周西伯昌”)主要是曹操向内外臣僚及天下表明心 迹，当他翦灭群凶之际，功高震主之时，正所谓“君子终日乾乾，夕惕若 厉”者，但东吴孙权却瞅准时机竟上表大说天命而称臣，意在促曹操代汉 而使其失去“挟天子以令诸侯”之号召， 故曹操机敏地认识到“ 是儿欲据吾著炉上郁!”故曹操运筹谋略而赋此《短歌行 ·周西伯 昌》。 西伯姬昌在纣朝三分天下有其二的大好形势下， 犹能奉事殷纣， 故孔子盛称 “周之德， 其可谓至德也已矣。 ”但纣王亲信崇侯虎仍不免在纣王前 还要谗毁文王，并拘系于羑里。曹操举此史实，意在表明自己正在克心效法先圣 西伯姬昌，并肯定他的所作所为，谨慎惕惧，向来无愧于献帝之所赏。 并大谈西伯姬昌、齐桓公、晋文公皆曾受命“专使征伐”。而当 今天下时势与当年的西伯、齐桓、晋文之际颇相类似，天子如命他“专使 征伐”以讨不臣，乃英明之举。但他亦效西伯之德，重齐桓之功，戒晋文 之诈。然故作谦恭之辞耳，又谁知岂无更讨封赏之意乎 ?不然建安十八年(公元 213 年)五月献帝下诏曰《册魏公九锡文》，其文曰“朕闻先王并建明德， 胙之以土，分之以民，崇其宠章，备其礼物，所以藩卫王室、左右厥世也。其在 周成，管、蔡不静，惩难念功，乃使邵康公赐齐太公履，东至于海，西至于河， 南至于穆陵，北至于无棣，五侯九伯，实得征之。 世祚太师，以表东海。爰及襄王，亦有楚人不供王职，又命晋文登为侯伯， 锡以二辂、虎贲、斧钺、禾巨 鬯、弓矢，大启南阳，世作盟主。故周室之不坏， 系二国是赖。”又“今以冀州之河东、河内、魏郡、赵国、中山、常 山，巨鹿、安平、甘陵、平原凡十郡，封君为魏公。锡君玄土，苴以白茅，爰契 尔龟。”又“加君九锡，其敬听朕命。” 观汉献帝下诏《册魏公九锡文》全篇，尽叙其功，以为其功高于伊、周，而 其奖却低于齐、晋，故赐爵赐土，又加九锡，奖励空前。但曹操被奖愈高，心内 愈忧。故曹操在曾早在五十六岁写的《让县自明本志令》中谓“或者人见 孤强盛， 又性不信天命之事， 恐私心相评， 言有不逊之志， 妄相忖度， 每用耿耿。

2019年TPO22托福口语Task3原文及参考答案

2019年TPO22托福口语Task3原文及参考答案 TPO22口语Task3题目： University Announces Change in Campus Tour Guides Traditionally, staff members from the admissions office have led the campus tours for secondary-school students who are considering attending the university. Beginningnext semester, however, current students will lead these guided walks around the campus instead. “The staff of the admissions office no longer have time to lead the campus tours. We need to focus our resources on our other responsibilities,” explain Christine Tanner, the director of admissions.“Furthermore, we feel that current students will offer unique and valuable insight to our visitors during these campus tours.” Conversation Now listen to two students discussing the article. Man： So, what do you think of this? Woman：Well, I think it’s a good idea, necessary, too. Man： Why is that? Woman：Well, you know, I’ve actually been up to the admissions office a couple of times, like, to pick up some information for a friend, you know, and every time I’ve ever been there, wow, you can tell they’re really busy. Man： Oh, really.

2020年托福考试口语范文练习题及答案(1)完整篇.doc

2017年托福考试口语范文练习题及答案(1) .Which one of the following to invitation will you go to, a family dinner party or a friends party? If the following two things overlap with each other, which would you prefer: dinner together with your family or attend your friends’party on the weekend? 托福口语范文一: Personally, I would say I will definitely go to a family dinner. First off, having dinner with families can help me to connect more with my families. Parents are the very first teachers in our psychological development, and they, together with other family members shape our early behaviors, values and even habits. So, I should keep families company. Additionally, as an adult, I am so overwhelmed with my schoolwork, like, assignments, presentations, and group projects. Seldom do I have time to interact with my families, thus I will never let go any chance to get more connected with families since they are such a big part of our lives. 托福口语范文二: Sample answer I would prefer to go back home to spend time with my family in a dinner party. I was working in a strange city far away from home and rarely

托福综合口语TASK2各类实用模板分享

托福综合口语TASK2各类实用模板分 享 托福口语和写作一样，都是属于需要考生自己组织语言来进行表达输出的考试题型。今天给大家带来了托福综合口语TASK2各类实用模板分享,希望能够帮助到大家，下面就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。 【精选素材】托福综合口语TASK2各类实用模板分享 托福综合口语TASK2备考模版 1、“The school has implemented a new policy that ... due to ... . And the man/woman holds a positive/negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that ... . And the second one is based on the fact that ... .” 2、From the reading material, we know that (the college) is going to ... Obviously, the man/woman in the conversation thinks that this is a great/bad idea, due to the following reasons..

One reason is that……. Another is,……. (万一有时间)So thats all the reasons s/he has to form that opinion. (尽量记，听为主) 3、The man/woman’s opinion about STH is that……. (选择方案型：听选择的原因。1.Firstly, the man/woman states that…….2.And then he/she states that…….) (提出建议型：听建议的利弊。1.Firstly, the man/woman talks about the positive aspect of this issue. He/she states that…….2.On the other hand, the man/man also talks about the negative aspect of this question. He/she points out that…….) 4、阅读引用部分的模版 (1) In the readingmaterial, (2) There is a/anannouncement/message/notice/proposal about ..记下的关键词) (3) The university/college is going to..(稍稍展开下) (4) In the listeningmaterial, two students discussabout the..填入关键词) 听力中人物表达观点的模版:

托福口语第三题模板

托福口语第三题模板 一口语部分模板 1、“The school has implemented a new policy that……due to……And the man/woman holds a positive/negative view towards the announcement. The first reason s/he gives is that……And the second one is based on the fact that……" 2、From the reading material，we know that (the college) is going to……Obviously，the man/woman in the conversation thinks that this is a great/bad idea，due to the following reasons.。 One reason is that…… Another is…… (万一有时间)So that‘s all the reasons s/he has to form that op inion. (尽量记，听为主) 3、The man/woman’s opinion about STH is that…… (选择方案型：听选择的原因。1.Firstly，the man/woman states that…….2.And then he/she states that……。 (提出建议型：听建议的利弊。1.Firstly，the man/woman talks about the positive aspect of this issue. He/she states that…….2.On the other hand，the man/man also talks about the negative aspect of this question. He/she points out that……。) 4、阅读引用部分的模版 (1) In the readingmaterial， (2) There is a/anannouncement/message/notice/proposal about ****(填入记下的关键词) (3) The university/college is going to****(稍稍展开下) (4) In the listeningmaterial，two students discussabout the***(填入关键词) 二听力中人物表达观点的模版 1 The man/woman is against/supporting the*** 2 He or she feels unhappy/less satisfied about*** 3 He or She thinks the*** is unfair/inconvenient/unaffordable for the following reasons： 4 The man/woman’s opinion about STH is that……。 三理由展开部分的模版： 1 First，he thinks/says**** ; Also，he points out that**** 2 Firstly，the man/woman states that……。; And then he/she states that……。 3 支持+反对 Firstly，the man/woman talks about the positive aspect of this issue. He/she states that…….On the other hand，the man/man also talks about the negative aspect of this question. He/she points out that……。