Death Penalty
Original Report
The Original Report From Negative Side
(Death Penalty Should not Exist)
G ood morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , we are now here debating whether death penalty should exist, and we think the negative answer should be chosen.
The reasons why we say so are determined by a lot of factors,which can be listed as follows:
First of all, Death Penalty sends the wrong message: why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong.
Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place; however, the death penalty has a message of "You killed one of us, so we'll kill you". The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. Does that make sense?
Second, with the growth of knowledge, we can easily find that the death penalty can not be an effective deterrent for serious crimes.
Stephen Nathanson, the author of “An Eye for an Eye”
said, “Mountain climbers risk their lives for thrill and adventure; cigarette smok ers risk their lives for pleasure; speeding drivers risk their lives in order to get t o their destinations a bit faster.” The same goes with criminals. If a criminal te nds to kill somebody, He just lost his reason , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penalty.
Furthermore,financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is 2-5 times more than that of keeping someone in prison for life.
Judges, attorneys and court reporters all require a substantial investment by the taxpayers. Do we really have the resources to waste?
To conclude , today the abolition of the death penalty in our country, is the result of humanization, and a higher level of understanding of
punishment. So, our country should abolish the death penalty.
free debating
问题一 Today's data shows that life imprisonment could achieve the same effect as the death penalty and it’s more humanity .so,my dear fellow debaters ,i would be glad to hear your opinion .
that’s a good point.but i can’t entirely agree,
First, the use of life imprisonment will bring enormous pressure to our country’s financial costs. Countries have to use taxpayers’money for basic necessities of prisoners.
furthermore, China is a resource- poor country.
second,in fact,life imprisonment is more cruel than death penalty. You say the death penalty is inhumane, but being imprisoned for life lets the criminals live without hope, isn't it a kind of inhuman?In the view of personal point,death penalty is inhuman than life imprisonment ,but,in the view of country life imprisonment is inhuman ,don’t you think the country benefit is more important than personal benefit? thank you
问题二 The abolition of the death penalty is the pursuit of human civilization. would u like to prevent the development?
Thank you for your question! but
we don't think the abolition of the death penalty is the development of human civilization.Those who make mistakes must pay the price, so that our society can be in
order .Why should a murderer deserve to breathe the air?
Why should we pay our money to keep them that way?
Do you agree that ? I ‘m sure you are agree me .
问题三Don’t you think death penalty will lead the criminal’s family in great trouble?
Well ,yes ,but
this fact can not be a reason for abolishing the death penalty, because the victims’ families bear greater pain.
And death penalty is the fair way to resolve their pain. And if a criminal isn’t sentenced to death, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime spree. You see,the consequences of this is to bring more victims and more pain. The abolition of the death penalty on the criminals is a good choice.But it is a great hidden danger to society.
So this returns to the benefit between the collective and the individual, I think there is no need to repeat.
问题四:If you killed someone, do you want to have a second chance to repay community?
Of course, you said very reasonable, but
premise is the murderer wants to repay community .And it is impossible to guarantee the right of all the people, so we need death penalty to protect as many people as we can.The one who invade the rights of others to an extreme degree has no standpoint to ask for equal rights. After all,we can’t make experiment with the personal safety.
That’s all i want to say. thank you.
conclusion
Good morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , I'm honored to be here to make a small summary statement.
Before I go any further,please let me spell out once again what my position is.we insist that death penalty should not be applied .
First of all,
we should have a clear understanding on killing.We as a society have to move away from the “eye for an eye”revenge mentality if civilization is to advance.
Death penalty sends the wrong message :why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong.The death penalty is a violation of our human rights.
The right to live is a basic right of every human being , and no man has the right to decide when a life should be over ,even if it is our country.
what is more,
the purpose of death penalty is to prevent people from breaking the laws; but in fact,the effects are not as good as we expect .
According to a investigation , in the nearly 20 years , the crime rate didn’
t decreased but even increased .
According to Stephen Nathanson, the author of “An Eye for an Eye”, the fear of de ath does not usually stop people from doing what they want to do. “Mountain climb ers risk their lives for thrill and adventure; cigarette smokers risk their lives for pleas ure; speeding drivers risk their lives in order to get to their destinations a bit faster.” The same goes with criminals. If a criminal tends to kill somebody, He just lost his reason , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penalty.
Thirdly , The criminal is not the only one who has to face the punishment. The prisoner’s family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death at the same time.
However,it’s unjust for his/her family to get emotional punishment .
So ,from our analysis, we can say death penalty should not be applied.Thank you ! Original Report
The Original Report From Positive Side
（Death Penalty Should Exist）Good morning, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters ,ladies and gentleman , we are now here debating whether death penalty should exist, and we think the positive answer should be chosen .
Firstly, death penalty can make justice better served. The most fundamental principle of justice is that the punishment should fit the crime. When someone plans and brutally murders another person, doesn't it make sense that the punishment for the perpetrator also be death?
furthermore, perhaps the biggest reason to keep the death penalty is to prevent the crime from happening again. The parole system nowadays is a joke. Even if a criminal is sentenced to life without
possibility of parole, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime spree.
Last but not the least important,it contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system.
Each additional prisoner requires a portion of a cell, food, clothing and so on.
Prisons across the country face the problem of too many prisoners and not enough space & resources.When you eliminate the death penalty as an option, it means that prisoner must be housed for life. Thus, it only adds to the problem of an overcrowded prison system.
Taking all the factors above into account,we do believe and strongly support that Death Penalty Should Exist.Thank you!
free debating
1,We think death penalty ban the criminal from making mistakes
again radically, what do u think about it?
that’s a good point.but i can’t entirely agree,
i think we should focus on education rather than punishment.For example，Chinese authorities still face threats from groups in Xinjiang ,although we have killed many people.So,it’s clear that we can ban the criminal ,for only we educate them rather than kill them,
2,If we don’t adopt death penalty,but life sentence，don’t u think it’s a waste to us to spend our taxes to raise criminals？
i’m afraid you are wrong there.
In fact,carrying out one death sentence costs 2-5 times more than keeping that same criminal in prison. How can this be? It has to do with the endless appeals, additional required procedures, and legal wrangling that drag the process out.
What’s more , We can let them do Labor Reformation in prison, to compensate for social.
so,as for which one wastes more ,i know now you are agree with me!
3,we think death penalty is a development of our civilization, let’s have your opinion.
Thank you for your question! but We as a society have to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality if civilization is to advance,because it will never solve anything.
Why do you think the Israeli-Palestine conflict has been going on for 60+ years? Why do you think gang violence in this country never seems to end?
Because the state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. But you know whether that make sense.
4,We use the death penalty to deter crime.Don’t u think
the existence of death penalty
makes people too fear to do malicious things？
well ,yes , but in fact,the effects are not as good as u expect . first,According to a investigation , in the nearly
20 years , the crime rate didn’t decreased but even increased . second,Stephen Nathanson, the famous author
said , the fear of death does not usually stop people from doing what they want to do. “Mountain climbers risk their lives for thrill and adventure.” The same goes with
criminals. If a criminal tends to kill somebody, He just lost his rea son , Nothing can stop him ,even the death penalty.That’s all i want to say. thank you.
conclusion
Death penalty should exist ( conclusion )
Good afternoon, honorable judge, my dear fellow debaters , ladies and gentleman ,for summary according all the factors ,we do believe that death penalty should exist.
As all the nations are trying to build a law-governed society, death penalty can work as a powerful legal method to guarantee the
stability of society and protect the right of the majority of people. People create law to regulate and better serve the society. Law gives the government right to end a people’s life legally with the fundamental aim to reduce crime. It is true death penalty is a way to punish criminals,
death penalty exists because we want to prevent others from committing crime. All the things should have a limitation, including humanism. The statement that death penalty should be abolished is in fact a blind pursuit of humanism. It is impossible to guarantee the right of all the people, so we need death penalty to protect as many people as we can. To put an extreme criminal who does not feel sorry about what he or she has done is not against the idea of humanism, because the one who invade the rights of others to an extreme degree has no standpoint to ask for equal rights. To give up putting an extreme criminal to death so easily is against the equality of life and invades the victims’ dignity of life.
We strongly support the idea that death penalty should exist. That is all, thank you.
参考（有道ps...）
The death penalty gives closure to the victim's families who have suffered so much. Some family members of crime victims may take years or decades to recover from the shock and loss of a loved one. Some may never recover. One of the things that helps hasten this recovery is to achieve some kind of closure. Life in prison just means the criminal is still around to haunt the victim. A death sentence brings finality to a horrible chapter in the lives of these family members.
1。死刑关闭了受害者的家庭遭受了这么多。一些犯罪受害者的家属可能需要几年或几十年从震惊中恢复过来,并失去所爱的人。有些人可能无法恢复的一件事,帮助加速经济复苏是实现某种关闭。终身监禁只是意味着犯罪仍在困扰着受害者。死刑带给一个可怕的结局章这些家庭成员的生活。
2. It creates another form of crime deterrent. Crime would run rampant as never before if there wasn't some way to deter people from committing the acts. Prison time is an effective deterrent, but with some people, more is needed. Prosecutors should have the option of using a variety of punishments in order to minimize crime.
它创造了另一种形式的犯罪的威慑。犯罪会泛滥成灾，从未有过如果没有办法
阻止人们犯罪行为。监狱的时间是一个有效的威慑力，但对有些人来说，更是
需要的。检察官应该使用各种惩罚，为了减少犯罪的选项。
Justice is better served. The most fundamental principle of justice
is that the punishment should fit the crime. When someone plans and brutally murders another person, doesn't it make sense that the punishment for the perpetrator also be death?
正义是更好的服务。正义的最基本原则是罪刑相适应。当有人计划和残忍地杀
害了另外一个人，没有道理，对犯罪者的惩罚也会死吗？
Our justice system shows more sympathy for criminals than it does victims. It's time we put the emphasis of our criminal justice system back on protecting the victim rather than the accused. Remember, a person who's on death row has almost always committed crimes before this. A long line of victims have been waiting for justice. We need justice for current and past victims.
我们的司法系统显示更多的同情而不是罪犯的受害者。我们把我们的刑事司法
系统的重点在保护受害者而不是指责时间。记住，一个人对死刑的人几乎都犯
了罪，在这之前。一长排的受害者都是在等待正义。我们需要为当前和过去的
受害者正义。
5. It provides a deterrent for prisoners already serving a life sentence. What about people already sentenced to life in prison.
What's to stop them from murdering people constantly while in prison? What are they going to do--extend their sentences? Sure, they can
take away some prison privileges, but is this enough of a deterrent
to stop the killing? What about a person sentenced to life who happens to escape? What's to stop him from killing anyone who might
try to bring him in or curb his crime spree?
它为囚犯提供了一种威慑已经服无期徒刑。人已经被判处终身监禁。是什么阻
止他们谋杀人不断在监狱里吗?他们要做——扩展的句子是什么?当然,监狱可以带走一些特权,但这是足够的威慑阻止杀戮吗?怎么一个人判处终身而逃脱?是什么阻止他杀死的人可能试图带他或抑制疯狂犯罪吗?
DNA testing and other methods of modern crime scene science can now effectively eliminate almost all uncertainty as to a person's guilt
or innocence. One of the biggest arguments against the death penalty
is the possibility of error. Sure, we can never completely eliminate all uncertainty, but nowadays, it's about as close as you can get. DNA testing is over 99 percent effective. And even if DNA testing and other such scientific methods didn't exist, the trial and appeals process is so thorough it's next to impossible to convict an innocent person. Remember, a jury of 12 members must unanimously decide
there's not even a reasonable doubt the person is guilty. The number
of innocent people that might somehow be convicted is no greater than the number of innocent victims of the murderers who are set free. DNA测试和其他现代犯罪现场科学的方法可以有效地消除几乎所有的不确定性,
对一个人的有罪或无罪。最大的一个反对死刑是错误的可能性。当然,我们永远不可能完全消除所有的不确定性,但现在,它是关于尽可能密切。DNA测试是99%有效的。即使DNA测试等科学方法不存在,审判和上诉过程是如此彻底的是几乎不可能的罪犯一个无辜的人。请记住,12陪审团成员必须一致决定也没有合理
怀疑的人有罪。无辜的人的数量可能会以某种方式被定罪的数量没有超过无辜
受害者的凶手是谁释放。
Prisoner parole or escapes can give criminals another chance to kill. Perhaps the biggest reason to keep the death penalty is to prevent
the crime from happening again. The parole system nowadays is a joke. Does it make sense to anyone outside the legal system to have
multiple "life" sentences + 20 years or other liverish? Even if a criminal is sentenced to life without possibility of parole, he still has a chance to kill while in prison, or even worse, escape and go on a crime/murder spree.
罪犯假释或逃会给罪犯一次机会杀死。保持死刑也许最大的原因是防止犯罪再
次发生。如今假释制度是一个笑话。它有意义的法律体系以外的任何人有多个“生命”的句子+ 20年或其他jiverish吗?即使犯罪判处终身没有假释,他仍
然有机会杀死在监狱里,或者更糟的是,逃了出来,疯狂犯罪/谋杀。
It contributes to the problem of overpopulation in the prison system. Prisons across the country face the problem of too many prisoners and not enough space & resources. Each additional prisoner requires a portion of a cell, food, clothing, extra guard time, and so on. When you eliminate the death penalty as an option, it means that prisoner must be housed for life. Thus, it only adds to the problem of an overcrowded prison system.
它导致人口过剩的问题在全国监狱系统。监狱面临的问题太多的犯人和没有足够的空间和资源。每个额外的囚犯需要细胞的一部分,食物,衣服,额外的保护,等等。当你消除死刑作为一个选项,这意味着必须安置囚犯的生活。因此,它只增加了一个过度拥挤的监狱系统的问题。
It gives prosecutors another bargaining chip in the plea bargain process, which is essential in cutting costs in an overcrowded court system. The number of criminal cases that are plea bargained (meaning the accused admits guilt in return for a lesser sentence or some other concession) can be as high as 80 or 90 percent of cases. With the time, cost, and personnel requirements of a criminal case, there really isn't much of a choice. The vast majority of people that are arraigned are in fact guilty of the crime they are accused. Even if you believe a defendant only deserves life in prison, without the threat of a death sentence, there may be no way to get him to plead guilty and accept the sentence. If a case goes to trial, in addition to the enormous cost, you run the chance that you may lose the case, meaning a violent criminal gets off scot free. The existence of the death penalty gives prosecutors much more flexibility and power to ensure just punishments.
它给检察官辩诉交易过程中的另一个讨价还价的筹码,这是至关重要的在拥挤的法院系统降低成本。请求讨价还价的刑事案件数量(即被告承认有罪,以换取一个较小的句子或其他让步)可高达80或90%的病例。时间,成本,和人员需求的
一个刑事案件,实在是没有太多的选择。绝大多数人提审实际上是有罪的犯罪指控。即使你认为被告只值得终身监禁,没有死刑的威胁,可能没有办法让他认罪并接受这句话。如果一个案件进入审判,除了巨大的成本外,你跑的机会,你可能会失去,意味着暴力犯罪得到了苏格兰人自由。死刑的存在给检察官更多的灵活性和强大功能,确保惩罚。
Yes .金融成本转嫁给纳税人的死刑是几次,把他关在监狱里的生活。 1. Financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life.
Most people don't realize that carrying out one death sentence costs 2-5 times more than keeping that same criminal in prison for the rest of his life. How can this be? It has to do with the endless appeals, additional required procedures, and legal wrangling that drag the process out. It's not unusual for a prisoner to be on death row for
15-20 years. Judges, attorneys, court reporters, clerks, and court facilities all require a substantial investment by the taxpayers. Do we really have the resources to waste? 大多数人没有意识到实施一个死刑成本保持相同的2 - 5倍罪犯监禁他的余生,这怎么可能?这与无尽的上诉,额外所需的程序,和法律纠纷,将是不寻常的过程。一个犯了死罪的囚犯是15 - 20年。法官、律师,法庭记者,职员,和法院的设施都需要大量纳税人的投资。我们确实有资源浪费?
It is barbaric and violates the "cruel and unusual" clause in the
Bill of Rights.
这是野蛮的,违背了“残酷和不寻常”条款在《权利法案》。
Whether it's a firing squad, electric chair, gas chamber, lethal injection, or hanging, it's barbaric to allow state-sanctioned murder before a crowd of people. We condemn people like Ahmadinejad, Qaddafi, and Kim Jong Il when they murder their own people while we continue to do the same (although our procedures for allowing it are obviously more thorough). The 8th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prevents the use of "cruel and unusual punishment". Many would interpret the death penalty as violating this restriction.
无论是行刑队,电椅,毒气室,注射,或挂,这是野蛮的,让一群人之前政府允许的谋杀。我们谴责人喜欢内贾德,卡扎菲,金正日当他们谋杀自己的人当我们继续做同样的事情(虽然我们的程序允许它显然更彻底)。美国宪法第八修正案的防止使用“残酷和不寻常手段惩罚”的规定。许多人会解释死刑违反这一限制。
4. We as a society have to move away from the "eye for an eye" revenge mentality if civilization is to advance.我们作为一个社会必须摆脱“以眼还眼”复仇的心态如果文明进步。
The "eye for an eye" mentality will never solve anything. A revenge philosophy inevitably leads to an endless cycle of violence. Why do you think the Israeli-Palestine conflict has been going on for 60+ years? Why do you think gang violence in this country never seems to end? It is important to send a message to society that striking back at your enemy purely for revenge will always make matters worse. “以眼还眼”的心态将不能解决任何问题。复仇的哲学必然导致无休止的暴力循环。你为什么认为以色列和巴勒斯坦冲突已持续60年以上？你为什么觉得这个国家的帮派暴力似乎永远不会结束？它是向社会发出一个信息：反击敌人的纯粹的复仇会使事情变得更糟的重要。
5. It sends the wrong message: why kill people who kill people to show killing is wrong.
传达了错误的信息:为什么杀死人杀人杀人是错的。
Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place; however, the death penalty has a message of "You killed one of us, so we'll kill you". The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. Does that make sense?
是的,我们要确保有追究犯罪和一个有效的威慑;然而,死刑的消息“你杀了我们,所以我们会杀了你”。国家实际上是使用一个谋杀惩罚犯了谋杀罪的人。这是否有意义吗?
It is useless in that it doesn't bring the victim back to life.
它是无用的，它不把受害者复活。
Perhaps the biggest reason to ban the death penalty is that it
doesn't change the fact that the victim is gone and will never come back. Hate, revenge, and anger will never cure the emptiness of a
lost loved one. Forgiveness is the only way to start the healing process, and this won't happen in a revenge-focused individual.
禁止死刑也许最大的原因是,它并没有改变这一事实的受害者了,永远不会回来。仇恨、报复,和愤怒不会治愈失去亲人的空虚。宽恕是唯一的方式开始愈合过程,这不会发生在一个revenge-focused个体。
6. Life in prison is a worse punishment and a more effective deterrent.
终身监禁是一个糟糕的惩罚和更有效的威慑。
For those of you who don't feel much sympathy for a murderer, keep in mind that death may be too good for them. With a death sentence, the suffering is over in an instant. With life in prison, the pain goes on for decades. Prisoners are confined to a cage and live in an internal environment of rape and violence where they're treated as animals. And consider terrorists. Do you think they'd rather suffer the humiliation of lifelong prison or be "martyred" by a death sentence? What would have been a better ending for Osama bin Laden, the bullet that killed him instantly, or a life of humiliation in an American prison (or if he was put through rendition to obtain more information).
对于你们中那些不太感觉同情凶手,记住,死亡可能是太好了。死刑,瞬间痛苦结束。终身监禁,痛苦几十年来。囚犯被限制在一个笼子里,生活在一个内部环境
的强奸和暴力,他们视为动物。并考虑恐怖分子。你认为他们宁愿遭受的耻辱终身监狱或被死刑“殉道”?什么是更好的结局对奥萨马·本·拉登,子弹,立即杀了他,或屈辱的生活在美国监狱(或者,如果他通过表演来获得更多信息)。
7. Other countries (especially in Europe) would have a more favorable image of America. It's no secret that anti-Americanism is rampant around the world. One of the reasons is America's continued use of the death penalty. We're seen as a violent, vengeful nation for such a policy. This is pretty much the same view that Europeans had of America when we continued the practice of slavery long after it had been banned in Europe. 8. Some jury members are reluctant to convict if it means putting someone to death. Many states require any jury members to be polled during the pre-trial examination to be sure they have the stomach to sentence someone to death before they're allowed to serve. Even if they're against the death penalty, they still may lie in order to get on the panel. The thought of agreeing to kill someone even influences some jury members to acquit rather than risk the death. Some prosecutors may go for a lesser charge rather than force juries into a death-or-acquit choice. Obviously, in all these situations, justice may not be served. 9. The prisoner's family must suffer from seeing their loved one put to death by the state, as well as going through the emotionally-draining appeals process. One
victim's innocent family is obviously forced to suffer from a capital murder, but by enforcing a death sentence, you force another family to suffer. Why double the suffering when we don't have to? 10. The possibility exists that innocent men and women may be put to death. There are several documented cases where DNA testing showed that innocent people were put to death by the government. We have an imperfect justice system where poor defendants are given minimal
legal attention by often lesser qualified individuals. Some would blame the court system, not that death penalty itself for the problems, but we can't risk mistakes
Mentally ill patients may be put to death. Many people are simply
born with defects to their brain that cause them to act a certain way. No amount of drugs, schooling, rehabilitation, or positive reinforcement will change them. Is it fair that someone should be murdered just because they were unlucky enough to be born with a
brain defect. Although it is technically unconstitutional to put a mentally ill patient to death, the rules can be vague, and you still need to be able to convince a judge and jury that the defendant is in fact, mentally ill. 12. It creates sympathy for the monstrous perpetrators of the crimes. Criminals usually are looked down upon by society. People are disgusted by the vile, unconscionable acts they commit and feel tremendous sympathy for the victims of murder, rape, etc. However, the death penalty has a way of shifting sympathy away from the victims and to the criminals themselves. An excellent example is the execution a few years ago of former gang leader "Tookie" Williams. He was one of the original members of the
notorious Crips gang, which has a long legacy of robbery, assault,
and murder. This is a man who was convicted with overwhelming evidence of the murder of four people, some of whom he shot in the back and then laughed at the sounds they made as they died. This is a man who never even took responsibility for the crimes or apologized
to the victims -- NOT ONCE! These victims had kids and spouses, but instead of sympathy for them, sympathy shifted to Tookie. Candlelight vigils were held for him. Websites like https://www.doczj.com/doc/917091060.html, sprang up. Protests and a media circus ensued trying to prevent the execution, which eventually did take place -- 26 years after the crime itself! There are many cases like this, which make a mockery of the evil crimes these degenerates commit.
Using the death penalty to reduce or even eliminate crime Is a kind of superstition. Crime is a social political, economic, culture and education, morality, family relations, social factors
and individual interaction product of crime. Complex causes
of death could not eliminate crime, produced naturally can notfundamentally curb crime
A征求他人观点或意见的用语 I would be glad to hear your opinion of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。 Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗？ I was wondering where you stood on the question of … 我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语 Another poi nt is that … 另一点是…… Another way of looking at it is … 看这个问题的另一个看法是…… I forgot to say / tell you that… 我忘记要讲…... C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。 Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗？我相信你是赞同的。 D就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 As you said… 像你所说的那样…… But didn’t you say that…？但是，难道你没说过……吗？、 If I understood you correctly, y ou said that… 要是我理解正确的话，你说过……. E如何礼貌地反对对方某一观点 I’m not sure really. Do you think so? Well, it depends. I’m not so certain. Well, I’m not so sure about that. I’m inclined to disagree with that. No, I don’t think so really. F如何强烈反对对方某一观点 I disagree. I disagree with you entirely. I’m afraid I don’t agree.I’m afraid you are wrong there. I wouldn’t accept that for one minute.You can't really mean that. You can’t be serious.一辩：FIRST DEBATER 二辩：SECOND DEBATER 对方辩友，my fellow debaters 开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen.....后来的部分就和一般的议论问差不多了。 然后加点题外话：陈述的时候一定要自信，把握好时间，如果到后来时间到，你却没陈述完的时候也要保持自信，微笑，不管他们，把话说完，所以陈述部分的最后几句一定要背熟练。别忘了说THANK YOU。 如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logic 反对object to 观点opinion 总结summary
辩论赛范文英文用英语写一篇英语辩论赛的欢迎稿 克隆利弊争论比较大的就是伦理问题 作为正方可以回避伦理问题，抓住治疗科研方面突破，攻击对方弱点，让其无还手之机。 To clone or not to clone, is that the question? Advanced technology has already pushed human being to edges,such as the production of weapons of mass destruction,the destruction of Ozone by Freon ,and the application of clone.The heated deabte over whether cloning technique should be used in human reproduc-- tion must be considered as a serious issue. Clone, to a certain degree, is beneficial to mankind.Such disease as Parkinsons will possiblly be cured in the future in the hope of further applying of clone.However,the abuse of this technology will bring human being unthinkable destruction.
Since the declaration of the death of Dolly,we are more conscious of the inefficient procedure of clone.Acorrding to "Dolly's false legacy",the incidence of death among fetuses and offspring produced by cloning is much higher than it is through natural reproduction--roughly 10 times as high as normal before birth and 3 times as high after birth.And even you may argue that this technology will be perfected in the future, i don't see there is any point in whole--being cloning. Many people consider this technology a promising one as to bring all human being to a new era in which all human reproduction will be aomplished by cloning.Thus scientists in some countries have already started their great plan to clone human.But let's think, what is the practical value in doing so?You may ___ me that it can bring hope for those couples unable to have children because they might choose to have a copy of one of them rather than aept the gene intrusion from a doner.But imagine,if you have a child owning the same apperance as yours or your husband's, will you aept it without any unfort?
英语辩论赛常用语集锦大全 英语辩论赛越来越受师生们的喜欢，辩手们想要赢得比赛学会掌握一些常用语是很必要的。下面是小编搜集整理的英语辩论赛常用语荟萃集锦，欢迎阅读。更多资讯请继续关注辩论赛栏目。 英语辩论赛常用语荟萃集锦 inmyopinion…我的意见是…… personallyIthink……我个人认为…… Ibelievethat……我相信…… Ithinkthat……我觉得…… thepointisthat……关键是……，要点是..... ifyouaskme……如果你问我…… I’dliketosaythis：……我会这样说…… I’dliketopointoutthat我想指出的是…… speakingformyself站在自己的立场上说…… inmyexperience…根据我的经验…… challenginganopinion质疑某种观点 thatcan’tbetrue那不可能是真的。 butwhatabout…?但关于……方面呢? clarifyingapoint阐述观点 whatIsaidwas…我刚才说的是…… whatImeantosaywas…我的意思是说…… letmerepeatwhatIsaid.让我重复我刚才所说的。
letmerephrasewhatIsaid.让我重申刚才所说的。 agreeingwithanopinion同意观点 ofcourse当然。 right.是的。 exactly.对。 that’strue.是那样。 sodoI.(neitherdoI.)我也这样认为。(不这样认为。) Iagreecompletely.我完全赞同。 Iagreewithyouentirely.我完全同意你所说的。 you’reabsolutelyright.显然你是对的。 that’sagoodpoint.这个看法不错。 Icouldn’tagreewithyoumore.我绝对赞成你。 Ifeelthesameway.我也持同样的想法。 disagreeingwithanopinion反对意见。 however，…然而…… Idon’tthinkso.我不那样认为d.Idon’tthink…我认为……不是那样的。 ontheotherhand…另一方面…… onthecontrary.相反的。 that’snot(entirely)true.那不(完全)正确。 Ican’tpossiblyagreewithyou.我不可能同意你。 Ihatetodisagreewithyou，but…我不喜欢反对你，但…… allright，butdon’tyouthink…?好吧，但难道你不觉得……
Thanks for the Chairman，please let me give my best wishes to everyone here。Now，I will give you the conclusion of this debate。 Reviewing all the debate，it’s not difficult for us to find that there are three important errors my opposite debaters had made. First of all，Perhaps you ignored to analysis the topic of our debate. What we are discussing is which is more important，instead of that which is important；If I understood you correctly, you said that we are dependent on the opportunity so that we woul d say “NO” to the hard work，which I’m What we want to express is that when someone has opportunity and the hard work at the same time，The former is more important for him to achieve success. Wha t’s more,as we all know，man proposes, god disposes. AS the competitive nature of our society are more and more Intense in today’s life，people have to learn much more knowledge，put in more by ourselves while we can do hard work as much as possible。Thus，we insist that luck and opportunity are more important than hard work for people if you want to get succeed. The power of hard work is limited. Some things are just out of our reach. For instance, We pray for good weather before our picnic day, we pray for a clear head for a big test, we pray for a long life free of illness and accidents. We say “good luck” a lot and we really mean it. Everyone of us will need luck and opportunity at some point in our life.
BP赛制辩论赛的评判标准有哪些？ 2013年06月06日 BP辩论赛评判标准 英语辩论比赛规则要求裁判首先就全场比赛队伍的排名进行排序，然后再对每 一名选手按照个人评分的标准打个人表现分。我们首先介绍如何决定各个队伍排名，再介 绍如何为选手个人打分。 四队的排名 决定四队排名的根本因素在于四队的论点的说服力（persuasiveness）如何，而为了检验其论点的说服力，裁判需要做到： 1）不代入任何预设地，中立地裁判比赛——即不能因为个人主观支持一方观点而忽略另一 方观点 2）运用基本的常识检验辩论逻辑与内容——比如辩手用反常识的论点（如，太阳从西边升 起）裁判可以认定其错误，或者辩手逻辑不成立（如，因为全球粮食紧缺所以政府应当允 许同性恋婚姻）裁判也可以因此不接受具体论点 在裁判中立并给予各队公平的话语权之基础上，裁判需要“全面地评判”辩论设计的 各项细节（HolisticJudging）。比赛中每个辩论队的表现体现在诸多其对比赛的“贡献”（contribution）之上，比如其立论（argument）的质量，驳论（Rebuttal）的质量，正反方二队的拓展论点（extension）的质量，正反方四辩总结陈词（WhipSpeech）的质量，质询（POI）及其回答的质量，每队论点的逻辑体系是否完整，各个论点之间的 逻辑关系如何，等等不一而足。裁判需要在考虑各项因素以后，综合判断哪一个队对辩论 的贡献（即对辩论的推动）最大，按照各队的贡献评价各队的排名。 此外，辩手的台风（Manner）也是辩论的重要因素，但是台风本身并不能成为辩论 质量高的理由。比之于比赛的具体内容（Matter），台风的重要意义在于——内容体现观点本身，而台风体现辩手用什么样的方式表达具体内容——二者都是辩手是否有“说服力” 有机构成。但是对于“说服力”的大小，裁判应当将内容与台风同意考虑。没有内容的辩 论即使语言流畅，也不一定更有说服力；反之一个用轻松欢快的舞台感表达沉重严肃内容 的辩手，很可能由于其内容与表现方式的冲突丧失很大部分的说服力。因此台风是一个需 要具体情况具体分析的因素。 选手的个人得分： 在裁判评判出四队各自的排名以后，裁判需为每位选手打分，评判他们在辩论赛中的 表现。 请注意，按照英式议会制辩论规则——每轮比赛中，各队两位辩手个人得分之和从高 到低的顺序，应与队伍排名一致——即第一名的队伍个人总分应该最高，第二名第二高， 第三名第三高，第四名最低。不能有排名低的队伍总分高的情况出现。 个人得分按内容（Matter）与台风（Manner）各占50%比例打分。总分75分是选手一般来说的平均得分，具体标准见下表。
我方坚持认为” 应该是脱口而出We firmly insist that，“开头的观点the beginning viewpoint”，“最后的陈词the final statement” Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... Ways to open a debate ?To set the framework for our opinion, we believe it is necessary to state… ?We would like to introduce our stand by giving the following definitions. … ?In order to effectively debate this topic, we would like to propose…. ? A number of key issues arise which deserve closer examination. ?We will elaborate one of the most striki ng features of this problem, namely… ?In the first place we would like to make clear that….The main argument focuses on…. 1. Giving Reasons and offering explanations: ?To start with…, The reason why..., That's why..., For this reason..., That's the reason why..., ?Many people think...., Considering..., Allowing for the fact that..., When you consider that..., 2. Asking for an opinion from the other party ?I would be glad to hear your opinio n of … 我很乐意听听你对……的意见。 ?Are you of the same opinion as me? 你与我的看法一致吗？ ?I was wondering where you stood on the question of … 我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 ?well…what do you think (about ?Do you agree? (don't you agree?)你同意吗?(你是不是同意?) ?What's your view on the matter? how do you see it?你怎么看它? ?let‘s have your opinion.让我们听听你的意见！ ?do you think that…?你认为…吗 3. Stating an opinion陈述观点 ?I think..., In my opinion..., I believe… I'd like to point out that我想指出的是… ?Speaking for myself站在自己的立场上说…In my experience…根据我的经验… ?I'd like to say this：…我会这样说… I'd rather..., I'd prefer..., ?The way I see it..., As far as I'm concerned...,就我而言，… ?If it were up to me..., I suspect that..., ?I'm pretty sure that..., It is fairly certain that..., ?I'm convinced that..., I honestly feel that…, ?I strongly believe that..., Without a doubt...
一辩词自由辩：二辩：纸质书比电子书更有利于身体健康. There is no doubt about the rapid development of the e-book , but we don’t think that paper-books will be replaced by e-books. Nowadays, people are paying more and more attention to health issues. It is important to realize that e-books are easy to cause damage of our eyes and vision loss; And there are other health risks using e-books. When we read e-books rather than paper-books for a long time, paper-books are more healthier to the readers. 反方二辩：看纸质书看久了也会对视力不好 It is important to realize that paper-books are also easy to cause damage of our eyes and vision loss when we read for a long time. For example, Sushi(轼) is also a myopia man. 一辩：纸质书给作者的保护更完整，更能保证收入，而且纸质书拥有的是所有权而电子书只是使用权 Another problem is the copyright. Despite the current paper-book rampant piracy problem, it can protect the benefits of the author’s better than e-books. E-books raises the popularity of piracy. Although people may need to pay for their downloading some e-books, but in more cases ,the user only need click his mouse. And the writer usually get less payment for their books. The press often choose to publish real books and
英文辩论赛流程和规则 Company number：【WTUT-WT88Y-W8BBGB-BWYTT-19998】
附件： 英语辩论赛流程以及评分标准 一、英语辩论赛流程 英语辩论赛采用国际议会制比赛形式，参照第十三届“外研社杯”全国英语辩论赛的要求，具体流程为： 1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段： 比赛由正方和反方组成，双方各两名选手，选手可自行分工，一人担任一辩，一人担任二辩。比赛前15分钟主席将辩题(motion)公布给两队，并由抓阄决定正反方，正方对辩题持肯定态度，反方对辩题持否定态度，双方在辩论开始前有15分钟准备时间，辩论具体进行过程如下：1)正方一辩发言（7分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2）反方一辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 3）正方二辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 4）反方二辩发言（8分钟）
第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示 5）反方一辩总结（4分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第三分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时---举牌提示\ 6）正方一辩总结（5分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第四分钟结束时--举牌提示,第五分钟结束时---举牌提示 比赛阶段注意事项: 在提示牌提示结束后,有20秒宽限期,发言者必须在此期间内完成自己的发言,如果超过宽限期,则扣分.如果发言者发言时间远远少于规定时间,则评委会将此看作没有充分展开自己的观点而给发言者扣分. 在前1-4环节中,对方可以根据发言者正在申诉的论点提出本方的观点(pointofinformation,简称为POI) 比赛阶段提问者提出POI的注意事项: 1）POI要简短，切题，机智。严禁针对比赛规则和个人提出问题；2）提出POI时要从座位上起立，并举手示意.提问者可以用类似onthatpoint,Sir/Madam 的话引起发言者的注意； 3）发言者可以采取以下方式回应对方提出的POI:语言拒绝(类似sorry)、接受提问（类似ok）；
英语辩论常用短语荟萃 1. stating an opinion 陈述观点 a. in my opinion… 我的意见是…… b. personally I think…… 我个人认为…… c. I believe that…… 我相信…… d. I think that…… 我觉得…… e. the point is that…… 关键是……, 要点是..... f. if you ask me…… 如果你问我…… g. I’d like to say this：…… 我会这样说…… h. I’d like to point out that 我想指出的是…… i. speaking for myself 站在自己的立场上说…… j. as far as I’m concerned，… 就我而言，…… k. in my experience… 根据我的经验…… 2. challenging an opinion 质疑某种观点 a. tha t can’t be true 那不可能是真的。 b. but what about…？但关于……方面呢？ 3. clarifying a point 阐述观点 a. what I said was… 我刚才说的是…… b. what I mean to say was… 我的意思是说…… c. let me repeat what I sai d. 让我重复我刚才所说的。 d. let me rephrase what I said. 让我重申刚才所说的。 4. agreeing with an opinion 同意观点 a. of course 当然。 b. right. 是的。 c. exactly. 对。 d. that’s tru e. 是那样。
在座的各位大家晚上好， 由于绝大多数的学生都是在学校里吃住，所以像电视机，冰箱，洗衣机等大型电子产品与大学生生活并不是很大。与当代大学生有密切联系的电子产品主要有电脑，手机，U盘等小型电子产品。 诚如刚刚我方辩友所说，在这电子科技迅速发展的时代，电子产品确实给我们大学生带来了便捷的生活，但与此同时，也带来了很多负面影响。所以我方坚持认为“电子产品对于大学生是弊大于利” 众所周知，当代大学生是一个先进的群体，所以功能丰富的电子产品特别能吸引大学生。而当代大学生又是知识的追求者，书籍上的内容已经完全无法来满足他们的求知欲了。这时候对方辩友肯定会说现代的电子产品还能丰富大学生的课余生活，但是不知大家有没有发现，在手机，电脑等一些电子产品渐渐入侵我们的生活时，我们也越来越离不开它们了，他们逐渐成为了我们生活的必需品。 请对方辩友好好反思一下，是否出门在外发现手机没带会心慌意乱？是否感觉电子产品把整个世界变小了，却让我们离身边的人越来越远了？是否感觉我们宅在家里的时间长了，出去运动的时间越来越少了？我们专注做事情的时间越来越少，而分散注意力上网的时间越来越多了？ 看，对电子产品的过分依赖和过度使用已经严重影响到了大学生的作息和身体健康状况。但是很多时候我们明明知道确纠正不过来，毕竟电子产品就在桌子上，诱惑那么大。“亚当和夏娃都偷吃禁果了，我们怎么就不能玩一下手机呢？” 正是因为现代大学生还抵抗不了对电子产品带来的诱惑，所以其带来的危害远远大于其利处。 最后，我方坚持认为“电子产品对于大学生是弊大于利” Everyone here good evening, Due to the vast majority of students are at school to eat to live, so like televisions, refrigerators, washing machines and other large electronic products and college students' life is not very great. Is closely related to contemporary college students of electronic products mainly include computer, mobile phone, U disk and other small electronic products.
“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛比赛细则 一、报名方式 以团队为单位报名，每队由2名学生组成（即一个人扮演两个辩手的角色），填写详细准确的报名信息。内容包括： （1）队名（要求：积极向上，控制在10个字符之内，中英文不限），队名将作为该队在选拔赛对阵表中唯一标识； （2）2名辩手的姓名、所在院系及年级、手机号、常用邮箱； （注：赛前将由指导老师统一进行辩论指导） 二、参赛队伍构成： 每轮比赛由两支队伍构成，每队设两名辩手，正方一辩称为Leader of Proposition（正方领袖），二辩为Member of Proposition（正方成员）；反方一辩称为Leader of Opposition（反方领袖）, 二辩为Member of Opposition（反方成员）。 三、比赛规则： 为与省复赛及全国决赛接轨，本比赛采用目前国际流行的“议会式”辩论赛制（以下简称BP，即British Parliamentary Debating Format）。 比赛采用淘汰制，两个人组一队，参赛队伍通过抽签决定对手、辩论场地以及正方、反方。第一轮比赛结束，共有4支队伍晋级第二轮比赛。通过第二轮比赛选出2支队伍，最终产生PK选出一支队伍参加“外研社杯”全国大学生英语辩论赛福建省区复赛。（若参加比赛的队伍为单数，将通过抽签的方式选出一支队伍与第一轮比赛成绩最低的队伍PK，最终决定该队伍是否晋级第二轮复赛）四、辩论题目：This House Believes That Cooperation is better than Competition in promoting social advancement与竞争相比，合作更能使社会进步 五、比赛流程 （1）评分标准:每支辩论队两名辩手得分之和视为队伍得分,75分代表比赛选手的平均水平 （2）选手发言顺序: 每位选手都应按以下顺序进行发言：
1. How to agree strongly with an opinion 完全同意 I couldn't agree more! I'm of the same opinion. I don't think anyone would disagree. I can't argue with that. I'm sure you are right. I take your point. I'd go along with you there. I share your view on that. I quite agree with you. I'm with you on that. I'm with you there. That's just what I was thinking. That's absolutely true! That's a good point. That's just how I see it. That's exactly my opinion. Absolutely! You got it! That is true. 2. How to half agree with an opinion 部分同意Yes, perhaps. Well, yes. Yes, in a way. possibly. Yes, I agree up to a point. Well, you've got a point there. There's something in that, I suppose. I guess you could be right. Yes, I suppose so. That's worth thinking about. 3. How to disagree politely with an opinion 有礼貌的否决 I am not sure really. I can’t possibly agree with you.
Honorable judges, ladies and gentleman, my fellow debaters., good evening. Our side firmly believes that “live to work” means more to people. First of all, let’s have a look at the definitions of these two words. According to Collins advanced English dictionary, live not only means someone in a particular kind of life, but also means live for something, in order to achieve something in their life. Workit's not just doing a job which can enable us to earn money. It's exerting ourselves by doing mental or physical work for a purpose or out of necessity. Following are some aspects which can support our argument. First of all, work is a source of self-esteem and
satisfaction. We are emotionally dependent on it. Because we live in this world, we have need and desire, so we have to find a way to satisfy our need and desire. Our enthusiastic passion for work enhances our quality of life. Second, living to work is a positive living attitude. Live to work make people keep step to society development and progress. In the case of we are living in a competitive world, a positive attitude of living to work can make us keep pace with the world. Last but not least, only by choosing the attitude of living to work can we be unselfish and do more contribution to our society and environment.On the one hand, it will promote human civilization.On the
英语辩论赛常用语 A征求他人观点或意见的用语 I would be glad to hear your opinion of …我很乐意听听你对……的意见。Are you of the same opinion as I? 你与我的看法一致吗？ I was wondering where you stood on the question of …我想知道你对……问题怎么看。 B引入自己的新观点或看法的用语 Another point is that …另一点是…… Another way of looking at it is …看这个问题的另一个看法是…… I forgot to say / tell you that…我忘记要讲…... C就自己阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 That’s all I want to say. 我想说的就这些了。 Do you agree? I’m sure you agree. 你赞同吗？我相信你是赞同的。 D就对方阐述的观点进行总结时的用语 As you said…像你所说的那样…… But didn’t you say that…？但是，难道你没说过……吗？、 If I understood you correctly, you said that…要是我理解正确的话，你说过……. E如何礼貌地反对对方某一观点 I’m not sure really. Do you think so? Well, it depends.
I’m not so certain. Well, I’m not so sure about that. I’m inclined to disagree with that. No, I don’t think so really. F如何强烈反对对方某一观点 I disagree. I disagree with you entirely. I’m afraid I don’t agree. I’m afraid you are wrong there. I wouldn’t accept that for one minute. You can't really mean that. You can’t be serious. 大学生英语辩论赛的比赛规则及具体流程 1、主席致辞：宣布辩题及辩题相关背景资料；介绍选手包括学院、专业、年级及正反方所持观点等；介绍评委及比赛规则。 2.、比赛阶段： 1)正方一辩发言（7分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第六分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时---举牌提示 2）反方一辩发言（8分钟） 第一分钟结束时--举牌提示,第七分钟结束时--举牌提示,第八分钟结束时---举牌提示
英语辩论常用语（外语083的同学们看过来！）2009-12-16 22:19 | (分类:Rebe is learning!) 一辩：FIRST DEBA TER 二辩：SECOND DEBATER 对方辩友，my fellow debaters 开始的陈词，Honorable judges, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen..... 如果想要驳斥对方的逻辑，进行假设：according to your logic 反对object to 观点opinion 总结summary 辩论常用短语荟萃 1. stating an opinion 陈述观点 a. in my opinion…我的意见是…… b. personally I think……我个人认为…… c. I believe that……我相信…… d. I think that……我觉得…… e. the point is that……关键是……, 要点是..... f. if you ask me……如果你问我…… g. I’d like to say this：……我会这样说…… h. I’d like to point out that 我想指出的是…… i. speaking for myself 站在自己的立场上说…… j. as far as I’m concerned，…就我而言，…… k. in my experience…根据我的经验……
l.Another point is that …另一点是…… m.Another way of looking at it is …看这个问题的另一个看法是……n.I forgot to say / tell you that…我忘记要讲…... 2. challenging an opinion 质疑某种观点 a. that can’t be true 那不可能是真的。 b. but what about…？但关于……方面呢？ 3. clarifying a point 阐述观点 a. what I said was…我刚才说的是…… b. what I mean to say was…我的意思是说…… c. let me repeat what I sai d. 让我重复我刚才所说的。 d. let me rephrase what I said. 让我重申刚才所说的。 4. agreeing with an opinion 同意观点 a. of course 当然。 b. right. 是的。 c. exactly. 对。 d. that’s tru e. 是那样。 e. so do I. （neither do I.）我也这样认为。（不这样认为。） f. I agree completely. 我完全赞同。 g. I agree with you entirely. 我完全同意你所说的。 h. you’re absolutely right. 显然你是对的。 i. that’s a good point. 这个看法不错。
英语辩论赛四辩总结陈词模板 篇一：辩论赛四辩总结陈词 尊敬的主席、评委、对方辩友以及在座的各位同学大家好： 很高兴与对方辩友进行这场友谊辩论赛，下面请允许我代表正方进行总结陈词。 首先，由我进一步阐述我方的论点,我方并不否认外界的要求会对我们产生一些影响,但它只能作为一个产考，它并不能最终决定我们的意志，因为一个人，无论他身在何处，他永远能倾听到的是他内心的声音。在开篇立论时我方一辩就给声音下了一个明确的标准，“天下有道则现，无道则隐”，这里的声音指的是“有利于社会发展要求的，不违背道德底线的，与社会达成共性的原则、信念和意识。这时候我们应该充分发挥自己的才干，积极入世，而政治昏暗、社会民不聊生的时候，一个人更多的是倾听他内心的声音，为最底层的老百姓做事，而不是爬到高位为虎作伥、为民所耻。” 在辩论过程中我方通过大量的事例、道理，例如：陶渊明不为五斗米折腰、东晋竹林七贤不肯出仕、段祺瑞坚拒日本威逼利诱，不肯出山，晚节可嘉，从古代到现代，循序渐进，由浅入深的向大家证明了我方的观点，阐述了我方的观点——“天下有道则现，无道则隐”。
因此不论是在太平盛世还是乱世，每个人都应有正确的原则，坚定的信念作为自己的精神支柱，不畏艰难困苦，奋勇渐进。 纵观整场辩论赛，我方一不小心攥住了对方辩友的9大问题，但由于时间有限，下面我就只列举其中较为严重的5个问题。 第一个问题，定义的问题：对方辩友在辩论过程中将忠于可以的误解为参考 2，偷换概念：没有把握这场辩论赛的重心 3，以偏概全：对方以偏概全实在是盲人摸象，一叶障目 4，恶意逃避：对方反复对XX避而不谈，屡屡逃避我方问题，是不是对方自认理亏呢？ 5，断章取义 6，颠倒主体 孔子说，“邦有道则仕，邦无道则可卷而怀之。”“天下有道则见，无道则隐”是随着政治社会的不断变化而发生变化的，这种观念在两千多年的发展中已经深入中国人的心，这已经成为了中国的一种文化特质。 面对忠于外在要求所造成的种种弊端，如果对方同学还能告诉大家人要忠于外在要求的话，我只能用斯迈尔斯的一句话来与对方共勉：一个没有原则和意志的人就像一艘没有舵和罗盘的船一般，他会不断随着风的变化而被迫改变自己